No-cloning Theorem - Proof

Proof

Suppose the state of a quantum system A, which we wish to copy, is (see bra-ket notation). In order to make a copy, we take a system B with the same state space and initial state . The initial, or blank, state must be independent of, of which we have no prior knowledge. The composite system is then described by the tensor product, and its state is

There are only two ways to manipulate the composite system. We could perform an observation, which irreversibly collapses the system into some eigenstate of the observable, corrupting the information contained in the qubit. This is obviously not what we want. Alternatively, we could control the Hamiltonian of the system, and thus the time evolution operator U (for a time independent Hamiltonian, where is called the generator of translations in time) up to some fixed time interval, which yields a unitary operator. Then U acts as a copier provided that

for all possible states in the state space (including ). Since U is unitary, it preserves the inner product:

\langle e|_B \langle \phi|_A |\psi\rangle_A |e\rangle_B = \langle e|_B \langle \phi|_A U^{\dagger} U |\psi\rangle_A |e\rangle_B = \langle \phi|_B \langle \phi|_A |\psi\rangle_A |\psi\rangle_B,

and since quantum mechanical states are assumed to be normalized, it follows that

This implies that either (in which case ) or is orthogonal to (in which case ). However, this is not the case for two arbitrary states. While orthogonal states in a specifically chosen basis, for example:

and

fit the requirement that, this result does not hold for more general quantum states. Apparently U cannot clone a general quantum state. This proves the no-cloning theorem.

Read more about this topic:  No-cloning Theorem

Famous quotes containing the word proof:

    “The fact that several men were able to become infatuated with that latrine is truly the proof of the decline of the men of this century.”
    —Charles Baudelaire (1821–1867)

    “There are some persons in this world, who, unable to give better proof of being wise, take a strange delight in showing what they think they have sagaciously read in mankind by uncharitable suspicions of them.”
    —Herman Melville (1819–1891)

    “Ah! I have penetrated to those meadows on the morning of many a first spring day, jumping from hummock to hummock, from willow root to willow root, when the wild river valley and the woods were bathed in so pure and bright a light as would have waked the dead, if they had been slumbering in their graves, as some suppose. There needs no stronger proof of immortality. All things must live in such a light. O Death, where was thy sting? O Grave, where was thy victory, then?”
    —Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)