Athletic Spending
The U. S. Department of Education publishes statistics on athletic spending by colleges. In 2008-09, athletic spending by NESCAC schools was as follows:
| School | Athletic Spending | Div III rank | Amount per Student | Div III rank | # Varsity Athletes | Div III rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amherst | $4,787,882 | 12 | $2,821 | 5 | 525 | 38 |
| Bates | $3,935,033 | 19 | $2,215 | 21 | 610 | 18 |
| Bowdoin | $4,107,899 | 14 | $2,393 | 10 | 626 | 13 |
| Colby | $4,102,759 | 15 | $2,221 | 19 | 624 | 14 |
| Connecticut | $2,948,418 | 53 | $1,699 | 46 | 477 | 63 |
| Hamilton | $2,557,165 | 69 | $1,395 | 90 | 563 | 28 |
| Middlebury | $4,926,939 | 8 | $2,043 | 24 | 654 | 10 |
| Trinity | $4,469,160 | 13 | $2,049 | 23 | 610 | 19 |
| Tufts | $3,365,255 | 30 | $672 | 266 | 728 | 5 |
| Wesleyan | $4,067,608 | 16 | $1,480 | 75 | 586 | 22 |
| Williams | $4,891,702 | 9 | $2,466 | 7 | 793 | 2 |
Eight (out of eleven) NESCAC schools rank in the top 20 of Division III for total athletic spending. With the exception of Connecticut College, all NESCAC schools rank in the top 10% of Division III for # of varsity athletes. Connecticut College athletic spending and # of varsity athletes are low because it does not have a football team. Tufts per-student athletic spending is low because it has nearly double the undergraduate population (5,100) of its nearest NESCAC rival (Wesleyan, with 2,700).
Read more about this topic: New England Small College Athletic Conference
Famous quotes containing the words athletic and/or spending:
“Short of a wholesale reform of college athletics—a complete breakdown of the whole system that is now focused on money and power—the women’s programs are just as doomed as the men’s are to move further and further away from the academic mission of their colleges.... We have to decide if that’s the kind of success for women’s sports that we want.”
—Christine H. B. Grant, U.S. university athletic director. As quoted in the Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A42 (May 12, 1993)
“We can’t forever be spending our lives paying for political follies that never gave us anything but always took from us, and I am content with the narrowest metes and bounds provided I have peace and quiet for work.”
—Stefan Zweig (18811942)