Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet - English Law

English Law

The original owner can obtain protection against the former owner through the doctrine of estoppel (see also, s 21(1) of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 '...unless the owner of the goods is by his conduct precluded from denying the seller's authority to sell). Methods of the estoppel can be by words, by conduct, or by negligence.

Estoppel by words, or representation by the original owner through words that he is the true owner or has the owner's authority to sell:

  • Henderson & Co v Williams 1 QB 521
  • Shaw v Commissioner of Metropolitan Police 1 WLR 1332, following Henderson

Estoppel by conduct:

  • Farquharson Bros v C King & Co Ltd AC 325
  • Mercantile Bank of India Ltd v Central Bank of India AC 287, upholding Farquharson
  • Central Newbury Car Auctions Ltd v Unity Finance Ltd 1 QB 371

Mistake about identity:

  • Shogun Finance Ltd v Hudson UKHL 62

Read more about this topic:  Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet

Famous quotes containing the words english and/or law:

    “I’ve sometimes thought ... that the difference between us and the English is that the Scotch are hard in all other respects but soft with women, and the English are hard with women but soft in all other respects.”
    —J.M. (James Matthew)

    “It is time that we start thinking about foundational issues: about our attitudes toward fair trials... Who are the People in a multicultural society?... The victims of discrimination are now organized. Blacks, Jews, gays, women—they will no longer tolerate second-class status. They seek vindication for past grievances in the trials that take place today, the new political trial.”
    —George P. Fletcher, U.S. law educator. With Justice for Some, p. 6, Addison-Wesley (1995)