Definition
The modular group Γ is the group of linear fractional transformations of the upper half of the complex plane which have the form
where a, b, c, and d are integers, and ad − bc = 1. The group operation is function composition.
This group of transformations is isomorphic to the projective special linear group PSL(2,Z), which is the quotient of the 2-dimensional special linear group SL(2,Z) over the integers by its center {I, −I}. In other words, PSL(2,Z) consists of all matrices
where a, b, c, and d are integers, ad − bc = 1, and pairs of matrices A and −A are considered to be identical. The group operation is the usual multiplication of matrices.
Some authors define the modular group to be PSL(2,Z), and still others define the modular group to be the larger group SL(2,Z). However, even those who define the modular group to be PSL(2,Z) use the notation of SL(2,Z), with the understanding that matrices are only determined up to sign.
Some mathematical relations require the consideration of the group S*L(2,Z) of matrices with determinant plus or minus one. (SL(2, Z) is a subgroup of this group.) Similarly, PS*L(2,Z) is the quotient group S*L(2,Z)/{I, −I}. A 2x2 matrix with unit determinant is a symplectic matrix, and thus SL(2,Z)=Sp(2,Z), the symplectic group of 2x2 matrices.
One can also use the notation GL(2,Z) for S*L(2,Z), because an integer matrix is invertible if and only if it has determinant equal to ±1. Alternatively, one may use the explicit notation SL±(2,Z).
Read more about this topic: Modular Group
Famous quotes containing the word definition:
“I’m beginning to think that the proper definition of “Man” is “an animal that writes letters.””
—Lewis Carroll [Charles Lutwidge Dodgson] (1832–1898)
“According to our social pyramid, all men who feel displaced racially, culturally, and/or because of economic hardships will turn on those whom they feel they can order and humiliate, usually women, children, and animals—just as they have been ordered and humiliated by those privileged few who are in power. However, this definition does not explain why there are privileged men who behave this way toward women.”
—Ana Castillo (b. 1953)
“... if, as women, we accept a philosophy of history that asserts that women are by definition assimilated into the male universal, that we can understand our past through a male lens—if we are unaware that women even have a history—we live our lives similarly unanchored, drifting in response to a veering wind of myth and bias.”
—Adrienne Rich (b. 1929)