Interpretations of The Bull-slaying Scene
According to Franz Cumont, the imagery of the tauroctony was a Graeco-Roman representation of an event in Zoroastrian cosmogony described in a 9th century AD Zoroastrian text, the Bundahishn. In this text the evil spirit Ahriman (not Mithras) slays the primordial creature Gavaevodata which is represented as a bovine. Cumont held that a version of the myth must have existed in which Mithras, not Ahriman, killed the bovine. But according to Hinnells, no such variant of the myth is known, and that this is merely speculation: "In no known Iranian text does Mithra slay a bull"
David Ulansey finds astronomical evidence from the mithraeum itself. He reminds us that the Platonic writer Porphyry wrote in the 3rd century AD that the cave-like temple Mithraea depicted "an image of the world" and that Zoroaster consecrated a cave resembling the world fabricated by Mithras The ceiling of the Caesarea Maritima Mithraeum retains traces of blue paint, which may mean the ceiling was painted to depict the sky and the stars.
Beck has given the following celestial anatomy of the Tauroctony:
Component of Tauroctony | Celestial Counterpart |
---|---|
Bull | Taurus |
Dog | Canis Minor, Canis Major |
Snake | Hydra, Serpens, Draco |
Raven | Corvus |
Scorpion | Scorpius |
Wheat's ear (on bull's tail) | Spica |
Twins Cautes and Cautopates | Gemini |
Lion | Leo |
Crater | Crater |
Sol | Sun |
Luna | Moon |
Cave | Universe |
Several celestial identities for the Tauroctonous Mithras (TM) himself have been proposed. Beck summarizes them in the table below.
Scholar | Identification |
---|---|
Bausani, A. (1979) | TM associated with Leo, in that the tauroctony is a type of the ancient lion-bull (Leo-Taurus) combat motif. |
Beck, R.L. (1994) | TM = Sun in Leo |
Insler, S. (1978) | bull-killing = heliacal setting of Taurus |
Jacobs, B. (1999) | bull-killing = heliacal setting of Taurus |
North, J.D. (1990) | TM = Betelgeuse (Alpha Orionis) setting, his knife = Triangulum setting, his mantle = Capella (Alpha Aurigae) setting. |
Rutgers, A.J. (1970) | TM = Sun, Bull = Moon |
Sandelin, K.-G. (1988) | TM = Auriga |
Speidel, M.P. (1980) | TM = Orion |
Ulansey, D. (1989) | TM = Perseus |
Weiss, M. (1994, 1998) | TM = the Night Sky |
Ulansey has proposed that Mithras seems to have been derived from the constellation of Perseus, which is positioned just above Taurus in the night sky. He sees iconographic and mythological parallels between the two figures: both are young heroes, carry a dagger and wear a Phrygian cap. He also mentions the similarity of the image of Perseus killing the Gorgon and the tauroctony, both figures being associated with underground caverns and both having connections to Persia as further evidence.
Michael Speidel associates Mithras with the constellation of Orion because of the proximity to Taurus, and the consistent nature of the depiction of the figure as having wide shoulders, a garment flared at the hem, and narrowed at the waist with a belt, thus taking on the form of the constellation.
Beck has criticized Speidel and Ulansey of adherence to a literal cartographic logic, describing their theories as a "will-o'-the-wisp" which "lured them down a false trail." He argues that a literal reading of the tauroctony as a star chart raises two major problems: it is difficult to find a constellation counterpart for Mithras himself (despite efforts by Speidel and Ulansey) and that unlike in a star chart, each feature of the tauroctony might have more than a single counterpart. Rather than seeing Mithras as a constellation, Beck argues that Mithras is the prime traveller on the celestial stage (represented by the other symbols of the scene), the Unconquered Sun moving through the constellations. But again, Meyer holds that the Mithras Liturgy reflects the world of Mithraism and may be a confirmation for Ulansey's theory of Mithras being held responsible for the precession of equinoxes.
Read more about this topic: Mithraic Mysteries
Famous quotes containing the word scene:
“We [actors] are indeed a strange lot! There are times we doubt that we have any emotions we can honestly call our own. I have approached every dynamic scene change in my life the same way. When I married Charlie MacArthur, I sat down and wondered how I could play the best wife that ever was.... My love for him was the truest thing in my life; but it was still important that I love him with proper effect, that I act loving him with great style, that I achieve the ultimate in wifedom.”
—Helen Hayes (19001993)