Michael Dukakis - Electoral History

Electoral History

General Elections

Massachusetts gubernatorial election, 1974
Party Candidate Votes Percentage
Democratic Michael Dukakis 992,284 53.50%
Republican Francis W. Sargent 784,353 42.29%
Massachusetts gubernatorial election, 1982
Party Candidate Votes Percentage
Democratic Michael Dukakis 1,219,109 59.48%
Republican John Winthrop Sears 749,679 36.57%
Massachusetts gubernatorial election, 1986
Party Candidate Votes Percentage
Democratic Michael Dukakis 1,157,786 68.75%
Republican George Kariotis 525,364 31.20%
US presidential election, 1988 (Popular Vote)
Party Candidate Votes Percentage
Republican George H. W. Bush 48,886,597 53.4%
Democratic Michael Dukakis 41,809,476 45.6%
US presidential election, 1988 (Electoral College)
Party Candidate Votes Percentage
Republican George H. W. Bush 426 79%
Democratic Michael Dukakis 111 21%

Primary Elections

Massachusetts Democratic gubernatorial primary, 1978
Party Candidate Votes Percentage
Democratic Edward J. King 442,174 51.07%
Democratic Michael Dukakis 365,417 42.21%
Democratic Barbra Ackermann 58,220 6.72%
Massachusetts Democratic gubernatorial primary, 1982
Party Candidate Votes Percentage
Democratic Michael Dukakis 631,911 53.50%
Democratic Edward J. King 549,335 46.51%
1988 Democratic presidential primaries
Party Candidate Votes Percentage
Democratic Michael Dukakis 9,898,750 42.51%
Democratic Jesse Jackson 6,788,991 29.15%
Democratic Al Gore 3,185,806 13.68%
Democratic Dick Gephardt 1,399,041 6.01%
Democratic Paul M. Simon 1,082,960 4.65%
Democratic Gary Hart 415,716 1.79%
1988 Democratic National Convention
Party Candidate Votes Percentage
Democratic Michael Dukakis 2,877 70.09%
Democratic Jesse Jackson 1,219 29.70%
Democratic Richard H. Stallings 3 0.07%
Democratic Joe Biden 2 0.05%
Democratic Dick Gephardt 2 0.05%
Democratic Lloyd Bentsen 1 0.02%
Democratic Gary Hart 1 0.02%

Read more about this topic:  Michael Dukakis

Famous quotes containing the words electoral and/or history:

    Nothing is more unreliable than the populace, nothing more obscure than human intentions, nothing more deceptive than the whole electoral system.
    Marcus Tullius Cicero (106–43 B.C.)

    No one can understand Paris and its history who does not understand that its fierceness is the balance and justification of its frivolity. It is called a city of pleasure; but it may also very specially be called a city of pain. The crown of roses is also a crown of thorns. Its people are too prone to hurt others, but quite ready also to hurt themselves. They are martyrs for religion, they are martyrs for irreligion; they are even martyrs for immorality.
    Gilbert Keith Chesterton (1874–1936)