The Medical Rural Bonded Scholarship Scheme (MRBS) is an Australian government program designed to increase the availability of rural doctors.
Others take the view it is a concerted effort to ban access to Medicare, thus hiding a blow out in Medicare costs and lack of services. As part of the scheme doctors are required to work for 20 hours per week in an area classified as RA2-5 for 9 months of the year over 4-5.5 years, once they have attained Fellowship and commenced their return of service period. Where these doctors work for the rest of the time is up to them, the location they choose to work in also up to them although they are restricted to working in areas classified as RA2-5 for their return of service. Government documents obtained by Freedom of information indicate the Government is actually placing work restriction, on Doctors.
Government policy is to move population from areas of low work, generally rural to areas of high opportunity generally metropolitan centres.
Read more about Medical Rural Bonded Scholarship Scheme: MRBS Offers, MRBS Payments, Further Support For MRBS Scheme Participants, Rural and Remote Classification, Return of Service Obligations (RSO), Scheme and Contract Operation, Termination of Medical Students, Value of Payments and Debts Under The Contract, Loss of Medicare Rebate For 12 Years, Contrast With Bonded Medical Places, Constitutional Issues, Criticism
Famous quotes containing the words medical, rural, scholarship and/or scheme:
“If science ever gets to the bottom of Voodoo in Haiti and Africa, it will be found that some important medical secrets, still unknown to medical science, give it its power, rather than the gestures of ceremony.”
—Zora Neale Hurston (1891–1960)
“No, in your rural letter box
I leave this note without a stamp
To tell you it was just a tramp
Who used your pasture for a camp.”
—Robert Frost (1874–1963)
“Product of a myriad various minds and contending tongues, compact of obscure and minute association, a language has its own abundant and often recondite laws, in the habitual and summary recognition of which scholarship consists.”
—Walter Pater (1839–1894)
“Television programming for children need not be saccharine or insipid in order to give to violence its proper balance in the scheme of things.... But as an endless diet for the sake of excitement and sensation in stories whose plots are vehicles for killing and torture and little more, it is not healthy for young children. Unfamiliar as yet with the full story of human response, they are being misled when they are offered perversion before they have fully learned what is sound.”
—Dorothy H. Cohen (20th century)