Magnus Norman - Singles Performance Timeline

Singles Performance Timeline

Tournament 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Career SR Career win-loss
Australian Open A LQ LQ A 1R 1R 1R 2R SF 4R A A 0 / 6 9–6
French Open A A A A 2R QF 2R 1R F 1R 1R 1R 0 / 7 12–7
Wimbledon A A A A A 3R 1R 3R 2R A A A 0 / 4 5–4
US Open A A A A A 2R 2R 4R 4R A 1R 1R 0 / 6 8–6
Grand Slam SR 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 / 2 0 / 4 0 / 4 0 / 4 0 / 4 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 / 2 0 / 24 N/A
Grand Slam Win-Loss 0–0 0–0 0–0 0–0 1–2 7–4 2–4 6–4 15–4 3–2 0–2 0–2 N/A 34–24
Tennis Masters Cup A A A A A A A A RR A A A 0 / 1 0–3
Indian Wells Masters A A A A A A 2R A QF 1R A LQ 0 / 3 4–3
Miami Masters A A A A A A 1R 2R 3R 3R A LQ 0 / 4 3–4
Monte Carlo Masters A A A A A A 2R A 2R 2R 1R 3R 0 / 5 5–5
Rome Masters A A A A LQ A 2R A W 1R 1R 1R 1 / 5 7–4
Hamburg Masters A A A A A A 1R A QF 2R A A 0 / 3 4–3
Canada Masters A A A A A A A A 1R 2R 1R A 0 / 3 1–3
Cincinnati Masters A A A A A A A A 2R 1R 1R A 0 / 3 1–3
Madrid Masters (Stuttgart) 1R A LQ A A A 2R 3R 3R A 2R A 0 / 5 3–5
Paris Masters A A A A A 2R 2R 1R 2R A A A 0 / 4 2–4
Total Titles 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 5 5 0 0 0 N/A 12
Hardcourt Win-Loss 0–0 0–0 0–0 0–0 6–6 9–10 6–13 22–10 39–16 19–12 7–10 5–7 N/A 113–84
Grass Win-Loss 0–0 0–0 0–0 0–0 0–0 2–2 2–2 2–3 1–1 0–0 0–0 0–0 N/A 7–8
Carpet Win-Loss 0–1 0–0 0–0 0–0 0–0 11–7 3–3 0–1 0–1 1–1 0–0 0–0 N/A 15–14
Clay Win-Loss 0–0 0–0 0–0 3–2 7–4 20–7 17–13 20–8 27–7 5–9 5–9 5–12 N/A 109–71
Overall Win-Loss 0–1 0–0 0–0 3–2 13–10 42–26 28–31 44–22 67–25 25–22 12–19 10–19 N/A 244–177
Year End Ranking 690 588 1003 170 86 22 52 15 4 49 107 125 N/A N/A

A = did not participate in the tournament.

LQ = lost in the qualifying draw.

SR = the ratio of the number of singles tournaments won to the number of those tournaments played.

Read more about this topic:  Magnus Norman

Famous quotes containing the word performance:

    So long as the source of our identity is external—vested in how others judge our performance at work, or how others judge our children’s performance, or how much money we make—we will find ourselves hopelessly flawed, forever short of the ideal.
    Melinda M. Marshall (20th century)