Ballot Status
The following is a table comparison of ballot status for the Libertarian Party presidential nominee in 2012.
| Electoral Votes | 2012 | |
|---|---|---|
| States | 50 | 48 |
| Electoral Votes | 538 | 515 |
| Percent of population (EVs) | 100% | 95.1% (95.7%) |
| Alabama | 9 | On ballot |
| Alaska | 3 | On ballot |
| Arizona | 11 | On ballot |
| Arkansas | 6 | On ballot |
| California | 55 | On ballot |
| Colorado | 9 | On ballot |
| Connecticut | 7 | On ballot |
| Delaware | 3 | On ballot |
| Florida | 29 | On ballot |
| Georgia | 16 | On ballot |
| Hawaii | 4 | On ballot |
| Idaho | 4 | On ballot |
| Illinois | 20 | On ballot |
| Indiana | 11 | On ballot |
| Iowa | 6 | On ballot |
| Kansas | 6 | On ballot |
| Kentucky | 8 | On ballot |
| Louisiana | 8 | On ballot |
| Maine | 4 | On ballot |
| Maryland | 10 | On ballot |
| Massachusetts | 11 | On ballot |
| Michigan | 16 | (write-in) |
| Minnesota | 10 | On ballot |
| Mississippi | 6 | On ballot |
| Missouri | 10 | On ballot |
| Montana | 3 | On ballot |
| Nebraska | 5 | On ballot |
| Nevada | 6 | On ballot |
| New Hampshire | 4 | On ballot |
| New Jersey | 14 | On ballot |
| New Mexico | 5 | On ballot |
| New York | 29 | On ballot |
| North Carolina | 15 | On ballot |
| North Dakota | 3 | On ballot |
| Ohio | 18 | On ballot |
| Oklahoma | 7 | NOT on ballot |
| Oregon | 7 | On ballot |
| Pennsylvania | 20 | On ballot |
| Rhode Island | 4 | On ballot |
| South Carolina | 9 | On ballot |
| South Dakota | 3 | On ballot |
| Tennessee | 11 | On ballot |
| Texas | 38 | On ballot |
| Utah | 6 | On ballot |
| Vermont | 3 | On ballot |
| Virginia | 13 | On ballot |
| Washington | 12 | On ballot |
| West Virginia | 5 | On ballot |
| Wisconsin | 10 | On ballot |
| Wyoming | 3 | On ballot |
| District of Columbia | 3 | On ballot |
Read more about this topic: Libertarian Party (United States)
Famous quotes containing the words ballot and/or status:
“The ballot is stronger than the bullet.”
—Abraham Lincoln (1809–1865)
“What is clear is that Christianity directed increased attention to childhood. For the first time in history it seemed important to decide what the moral status of children was. In the midst of this sometimes excessive concern, a new sympathy for children was promoted. Sometimes this meant criticizing adults. . . . So far as parents were put on the defensive in this way, the beginning of the Christian era marks a revolution in the child’s status.”
—C. John Sommerville (20th century)