Electoral History
| Year |
Seats in House |
Liberal candidates |
Seats won |
Seat Change |
Popular vote |
% of popular vote |
Result |
Liberal leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1867 | 180 | 65 | 62 | +62 | 60,818 | 22.7% | Cons. majority | Brown |
| 1872 | 200 | 111 | 95 | +33 | 110,556 | 34.7% | Cons. minority | Blake |
| 1874 | 206 | 140 | 133 | +38 | 128,059 | 39.5% | Majority gov't | Mackenzie |
| 1878 | 206 | 121 | 63 | −70 | 180,074 | 33.1% | Cons. majority | Mackenzie |
| 1882 | 211 | 112 | 73 | +10 | 160,547 | 31.1% | Cons. majority | Blake |
| 1887 | 215 | 184 | 80 | +7 | 312,736 | 43.1% | Cons. majority | Blake |
| 1891 | 215 | 194 | 90 | +10 | 350,512 | 45.2% | Cons. majority | Laurier |
| 1896 | 213 | 190 | 118 | +28 | 401,425 | 41.4% | Majority gov't | Laurier |
| 1900 | 213 | 209 | 132 | +14 | 477,758 | 50.3% | Majority gov't | Laurier |
| 1904 | 214 | 208 | 139 | +7 | 521,041 | 50.9% | Majority gov't | Laurier |
| 1908 | 221 | 213 | 133 | −6 | 570,311 | 48.9% | Majority gov't | Laurier |
| 1911 | 221 | 214 | 85 | −48 | 596,871 | 45.8% | Cons. majority | Laurier |
| 1917* | 235 | 213 | 82 | −3 | 729,756 | 38.8% | Coalition gov't | Laurier |
| 1921 | 235 | 204 | 118 | +36 | 1,285,998 | 41.2% | Majority gov't | King |
| 1925 | 245 | 216 | 100 | −18 | 1,252,684 | 39.7% | minority gov't | King |
| 1926 | 245 | 189 | 116 | +16 | 1,294,072 | 42.7% | Majority gov't | King |
| 1930 | 245 | 226 | 90 | −26 | 1,716,798 | 44.0% | Cons. majority | King |
| 1935 | 245 | 245 | 173 | +83 | 1,967,839 | 44.7% | Majority gov't | King |
| 1940 | 245 | 242 | 181 | +8 | 2,365,979 | 51.3% | Majority gov't | King |
| 1945 | 245 | 236 | 125 | −56 | 2,086,545 | 39.8% | Majority gov't | King |
| 1949 | 262 | 259 | 190 | +65 | 2,878,097 | 49.2% | Majority gov't | St. Laurent |
| 1953 | 265 | 263 | 171 | −19 | 2,743,013 | 48.6% | Majority gov't | St. Laurent |
| 1957 | 265 | 265 | 105 | −66 | 2,703,687 | 40.9% | PC minority | St. Laurent |
| 1958 | 265 | 265 | 49 | −56 | 2,444,909 | 33.5% | PC majority | Pearson |
| 1962 | 265 | 264 | 100 | +51 | 2,862,001 | 37.2% | PC minority | Pearson |
| 1963 | 265 | 265 | 128 | +28 | 3,276,995 | 41.5% | minority gov't | Pearson |
| 1965 | 265 | 265 | 131 | +3 | 3,099,521 | 40.2% | minority gov't | Pearson |
| 1968 | 264 | 263 | 155 | +24 | 3,686,801 | 45.4% | Majority gov't | Trudeau |
| 1972 | 264 | 263 | 109 | −46 | 3,717,804 | 38.4% | minority gov't | Trudeau |
| 1974 | 264 | 264 | 141 | +32 | 4,102,853 | 43.2% | Majority gov't | Trudeau |
| 1979 | 282 | 282 | 114 | −27 | 4,595,319 | 40.1% | PC minority | Trudeau |
| 1980 | 282 | 282 | 147 | +33 | 4,855,425 | 44.4% | Majority gov't | Trudeau |
| 1984 | 282 | 282 | 40 | −107 | 3,516,486 | 28.0% | PC majority | Turner |
| 1988 | 295 | 294 | 83 | +43 | 4,205,072 | 31.9% | PC majority | Turner |
| 1993 | 295 | 295 | 177 | +94 | 5,598,775 | 41.2% | Majority gov't | Chrétien |
| 1997 | 301 | 301 | 155 | −22 | 4,994,377 | 38.5% | Majority gov't | Chrétien |
| 2000 | 301 | 301 | 172 | +17 | 5,251,961 | 40.9% | Majority gov't | Chrétien |
| 2004 | 308 | 308 | 135 | −37 | 4,951,107 | 36.7% | minority gov't | Martin |
| 2006 | 308 | 308 | 103 | −32 | 4,477,217 | 30.1% | Cons. minority | Martin |
| 2008 | 308 | 307 | 77 | −26 | 3,629,990 | 26.2% | Cons. minority | Dion |
| 2011 | 308 | 308 | 34 | −43 | 2,783,175 | 18.9% | Cons. majority | Ignatieff |
* In 1917, some Liberals ran under the Unionist banner, figures only count those who ran as "Laurier Liberals"
* 1949–1968 includes one Liberal-Labour MP who sat with Liberal caucus.
Read more about this topic: Liberal Party Of Canada
Famous quotes containing the words electoral and/or history:
“Nothing is more unreliable than the populace, nothing more obscure than human intentions, nothing more deceptive than the whole electoral system.”
—Marcus Tullius Cicero (10643 B.C.)
“All history attests that man has subjected woman to his will, used her as a means to promote his selfish gratification, to minister to his sensual pleasures, to be instrumental in promoting his comfort; but never has he desired to elevate her to that rank she was created to fill. He has done all he could to debase and enslave her mind; and now he looks triumphantly on the ruin he has wrought, and say, the being he has thus deeply injured is his inferior.”
—Sarah M. Grimke (17921873)