Relationship With Other Edit Distance Metrics
Levenshtein distance is not the only popular notion of edit distance. Variations can be obtained by changing the set of allowable edit operations: for instance,
- length of the longest common subsequence is the metric obtained by allowing only addition and deletion, not substitution;
- the Damerau–Levenshtein distance allows addition, deletion, substitution, and the transposition of two adjacent characters;
- the Hamming distance only allows substitution (and hence, only applies to strings of the same length).
Edit distance in general is usually defined as a parametrizable metric in which a repertoire of edit operations is available, and each operation is assigned a cost (possibly infinite). This is further generalized by DNA sequence alignment algorithms such as the Smith–Waterman algorithm, which make an operation's cost depend on where it is applied.
Read more about this topic: Levenshtein Distance
Famous quotes containing the words relationship with, relationship, edit and/or distance:
“Guilty, guilty, guilty is the chant divorced parents repeat in their heads. This constant reminder remains just below our consciousness. Nevertheless, its presence clouds our judgment, inhibits our actions, and interferes in our relationship with our children. Guilt is a major roadblock to building a new life for yourself and to being an effective parent.”
—Stephanie Marston (20th century)
“Henry David Thoreau, who never earned much of a living or sustained a relationship with any woman that wasn’t brotherly—who lived mostly under his parents’ roof ... who advocated one day’s work and six days “off” as the weekly round and was considered a bit of a fool in his hometown ... is probably the American writer who tells us best how to live comfortably with our most constant companion, ourselves.”
—Edward Hoagland (b. 1932)
“To a philosopher all news, as it is called, is gossip, and they who edit it and read it are old women over their tea.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)
“The particular source of frustration of women observing their own self-study and measuring their worth as women by the distance they kept from men necessitated that a distance be kept, and so what vindicated them also poured fuel on the furnace of their rage. One delight presumed another dissatisfaction, but their hatefulness confessed to their own lack of power to please. They hated men because they needed husbands, and they loathed the men they chased away for going.”
—Alexander Theroux (b. 1940)