Latvian Parliamentary Election, 2010 - Results

Results

The turnout was 62%.


e • d Summary of the 2 October 2010 Latvian Saeima election results
Parties and coalitions Votes % Seats Change
Unity (Vienotība)
  • New Era Party
  • Civic Union
  • Society for Other Politics
301,424 31.90% 33 +15
Harmony Centre (Saskaņas centrs)
  • Social Democratic Party "Harmony"
  • Socialist Party of Latvia
  • Daugavpils City Party
251,397 26.61% 29 +12
Union of Greens and Farmers (Zaļo un Zemnieku savienība)
  • Latvian Farmers' Union (Latvijas Zemnieku savienība)
  • Green Party of Latvia (Latvijas Zaļā partija)
190,025 20.11% 22 +4
National Alliance
  • For Fatherland and Freedom/LNNK (Tēvzemei un Brīvībai/LNNK)
  • All For Latvia! (Visu Latvijai!)
74,028 7.84% 8 ±0
For a Good Latvia (Par Labu Latviju!)
  • People's Party
  • Latvia's First Party/Latvian Way
73,877 7.82% 8 –25
For Human Rights in United Latvia (Par cilvēka tiesībām vienotā Latvijā) 13,845 1.47% 0 –6
Made in Latvia (Ražots Latvijā) 9,381 0.99% 0 ±0
Last Party (Pēdējā partija) 8,458 0.90% 0 ±0
For a Presidential Republic (Par prezidentālu republiku) 7,102 0.75% 0 ±0
Responsibility – Social Democratic Alliance of Political Parties (ATBILDĪBA – sociāldemokrātiska politisko partiju apvienība) 6,139 0.65% 0 ±0
People's Control (Tautas kontrole) 4,002 0.42% 0 ±0
Christian Democratic Union (Kristīgi demokrātiskā savienība) 3,487 0.37% 0 ±0
Daugava – For Latvia (Daugava – Latvijai) 1,661 0.18% 0 ±0
Total 944,825 100

Read more about this topic:  Latvian Parliamentary Election, 2010

Famous quotes containing the word results:

    Pain itself can be pleasurable accidentally in so far as it is accompanied by wonder, as in stage-plays; or in so far as it recalls a beloved object to one’s memory, and makes one feel one’s love for the thing, whose absence gives us pain. Consequently, since love is pleasant, both pain and whatever else results from love, in so far as they remind us of our love, are pleasant.
    Thomas Aquinas (c. 1225–1274)

    How can you tell if you discipline effectively? Ask yourself if your disciplinary methods generally produce lasting results in a manner you find acceptable. Whether your philosophy is democratic or autocratic, whatever techniques you use—reasoning, a “star” chart, time-outs, or spanking—if it doesn’t work, it’s not effective.
    Stanley Turecki (20th century)

    For every life and every act
    Consequence of good and evil can be shown
    And as in time results of many deeds are blended
    So good and evil in the end become confounded.
    —T.S. (Thomas Stearns)