Krull Dimension - Explanation

Explanation

We say that a strict chain of inclusions of prime ideals of the form: is of length n. That is, it is counting the number of strict inclusions, not the number of primes, although these only differ by 1. Given a prime, we define the height of, written to be the supremum of the set

We define the Krull dimension of to be the supremum of the heights of all of its primes.

Nagata gave an example of a ring that has infinite Krull dimension even though every prime ideal has finite height. Nagata also gave an example of a Noetherian ring where not every chain can be extended to a maximal chain. Rings in which every chain of prime ideals can be extended to a maximal chain are known as catenary rings.

Read more about this topic:  Krull Dimension

Famous quotes containing the word explanation:

    What causes adolescents to rebel is not the assertion of authority but the arbitrary use of power, with little explanation of the rules and no involvement in decision-making. . . . Involving the adolescent in decisions doesn’t mean that you are giving up your authority. It means acknowledging that the teenager is growing up and has the right to participate in decisions that affect his or her life.
    Laurence Steinberg (20th century)

    We live between two worlds; we soar in the atmosphere; we creep upon the soil; we have the aspirations of creators and the propensities of quadrupeds. There can be but one explanation of this fact. We are passing from the animal into a higher form, and the drama of this planet is in its second act.
    W. Winwood Reade (1838–1875)

    The explanation of the propensity of the English people to portrait painting is to be found in their relish for a Fact. Let a man do the grandest things, fight the greatest battles, or be distinguished by the most brilliant personal heroism, yet the English people would prefer his portrait to a painting of the great deed. The likeness they can judge of; his existence is a Fact. But the truth of the picture of his deeds they cannot judge of, for they have no imagination.
    Benjamin Haydon (1786–1846)