Knuth's Up-arrow Notation - Numeration Systems Based On The Hyperoperation Sequence

Numeration Systems Based On The Hyperoperation Sequence

R. L. Goodstein, with a system of notation different from Knuth arrows, used the sequence of hyperoperators here denoted by to create systems of numeration for the nonnegative integers. Letting superscripts denote the respective hyperoperators, the so-called complete hereditary representation of integer n, at level k and base b, can be expressed as follows using only the first k hyperoperators and using as digits only 0, 1, ..., b-1:

  • For 0 ≤ nb-1, n is represented simply by the corresponding digit.
  • For n > b-1, the representation of n is found recursively, first representing n in the form
where xk, ..., x1 are the largest integers satisfying (in turn)
...
.
Any xi exceeding b-1 is then re-expressed in the same manner, and so on, repeating this procedure until the resulting form contains only the digits 0, 1, ..., b-1.

The remainder of this section will use, rather than superscripts, to denote the hyperoperators.

Unnecessary parentheses can be avoided by giving higher-level operators higher precedence in the order of evaluation; thus,

level-1 representations have the form, with X also of this form;

level-2 representations have the form, with X,Y also of this form;

level-3 representations have the form, with X,Y,Z also of this form;

level-4 representations have the form, with X,Y,Z,T also of this form;

and so on.

The representations can be abbreviated by omitting any instances of etc.; for example, the level-3 base-2 representation of the number 6 is, which abbreviates to .

Examples: The unique base-2 representations of the number 266, at levels 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 are as follows:

.

Read more about this topic:  Knuth's Up-arrow Notation

Famous quotes containing the words systems, based and/or sequence:

    We have done scant justice to the reasonableness of cannibalism. There are in fact so many and such excellent motives possible to it that mankind has never been able to fit all of them into one universal scheme, and has accordingly contrived various diverse and contradictory systems the better to display its virtues.
    Ruth Benedict (1887–1948)

    The fetish of the great university, of expensive colleges for young women, is too often simply a fetish. It is not based on a genuine desire for learning. Education today need not be sought at any great distance. It is largely compounded of two things, of a certain snobbishness on the part of parents, and of escape from home on the part of youth. And to those who must earn quickly it is often sheer waste of time. Very few colleges prepare their students for any special work.
    Mary Roberts Rinehart (1876–1958)

    Reminiscences, even extensive ones, do not always amount to an autobiography.... For autobiography has to do with time, with sequence and what makes up the continuous flow of life. Here, I am talking of a space, of moments and discontinuities. For even if months and years appear here, it is in the form they have in the moment of recollection. This strange form—it may be called fleeting or eternal—is in neither case the stuff that life is made of.
    Walter Benjamin (1892–1940)