Knuth's Up-arrow Notation - Numeration Systems Based On The Hyperoperation Sequence

Numeration Systems Based On The Hyperoperation Sequence

R. L. Goodstein, with a system of notation different from Knuth arrows, used the sequence of hyperoperators here denoted by to create systems of numeration for the nonnegative integers. Letting superscripts denote the respective hyperoperators, the so-called complete hereditary representation of integer n, at level k and base b, can be expressed as follows using only the first k hyperoperators and using as digits only 0, 1, ..., b-1:

  • For 0 ≤ nb-1, n is represented simply by the corresponding digit.
  • For n > b-1, the representation of n is found recursively, first representing n in the form
where xk, ..., x1 are the largest integers satisfying (in turn)
...
.
Any xi exceeding b-1 is then re-expressed in the same manner, and so on, repeating this procedure until the resulting form contains only the digits 0, 1, ..., b-1.

The remainder of this section will use, rather than superscripts, to denote the hyperoperators.

Unnecessary parentheses can be avoided by giving higher-level operators higher precedence in the order of evaluation; thus,

level-1 representations have the form, with X also of this form;

level-2 representations have the form, with X,Y also of this form;

level-3 representations have the form, with X,Y,Z also of this form;

level-4 representations have the form, with X,Y,Z,T also of this form;

and so on.

The representations can be abbreviated by omitting any instances of etc.; for example, the level-3 base-2 representation of the number 6 is, which abbreviates to .

Examples: The unique base-2 representations of the number 266, at levels 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 are as follows:

.

Read more about this topic:  Knuth's Up-arrow Notation

Famous quotes containing the words systems, based and/or sequence:

    I am beginning to suspect all elaborate and special systems of education. They seem to me to be built up on the supposition that every child is a kind of idiot who must be taught to think.
    Anne Sullivan (1866–1936)

    The common erotic project of destroying women makes it possible for men to unite into a brotherhood; this project is the only firm and trustworthy groundwork for cooperation among males and all male bonding is based on it.
    Andrea Dworkin (b. 1946)

    It isn’t that you subordinate your ideas to the force of the facts in autobiography but that you construct a sequence of stories to bind up the facts with a persuasive hypothesis that unravels your history’s meaning.
    Philip Roth (b. 1933)