Kernel (category Theory) - Definition

Definition

Let C be a category. In order to define a kernel in the general category-theoretical sense, C needs to have zero morphisms. In that case, if f : XY is an arbitrary morphism in C, then a kernel of f is an equaliser of f and the zero morphism from X to Y. In symbols:

ker(f) = eq(f, 0XY)

To be more explicit, the following universal property can be used. A kernel of f is any morphism k : KX such that:

  • f k is the zero morphism from K to Y;
  • Given any morphism k′ : K′ → X such that f k′ is the zero morphism, there is a unique morphism u : K′ → K such that k u = k'.

Note that in many concrete contexts, one would refer to the object K as the "kernel", rather than the morphism k. In those situations, K would be a subset of X, and that would be sufficient to reconstruct k as an inclusion map; in the nonconcrete case, in contrast, we need the morphism k to describe how K is to be interpreted as a subobject of X. In any case, one can show that k is always a monomorphism (in the categorical sense of the word). One may prefer to think of the kernel as the pair (K,k) rather than as simply K or k alone.

Not every morphism needs to have a kernel, but if it does, then all its kernels are isomorphic in a strong sense: if k : KX and l : LX are kernels of f : XY, then there exists a unique isomorphism φ : KL such that l o φ = k.

Read more about this topic:  Kernel (category Theory)

Famous quotes containing the word definition:

    Was man made stupid to see his own stupidity?
    Is God by definition indifferent, beyond us all?
    Is the eternal truth man’s fighting soul
    Wherein the Beast ravens in its own avidity?
    Richard Eberhart (b. 1904)

    The physicians say, they are not materialists; but they are:MSpirit is matter reduced to an extreme thinness: O so thin!—But the definition of spiritual should be, that which is its own evidence. What notions do they attach to love! what to religion! One would not willingly pronounce these words in their hearing, and give them the occasion to profane them.
    Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)

    It is very hard to give a just definition of love. The most we can say of it is this: that in the soul, it is a desire to rule; in the spirit, it is a sympathy; and in the body, it is but a hidden and subtle desire to possess—after many mysteries—what one loves.
    François, Duc De La Rochefoucauld (1613–1680)