Linguistic and Historical Comparison
A comparison of the Kalaw Lagaw Ya, Meriam Mìr, Kiwai and Urradhi personal pronouns show similarities and differences in typology. In comparison to Urradhi, Kalaw Lagaw Ya has an archaic typology - or, rather, Urradhi has innovated. Kiwai, in comparison to the East Trans Fly languages, is aberrant in not having 1-2 pronouns, while Meriam Mìr is aberrant to itself in not having a dual and trial/paucal set of pronouns which correspond to its verb system. The Kalaw Lagaw Ya system in itself is essentially Australian:
Kalaw Lagaw Ya (KKY dialect) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
number | 1 | 1-2 | 2 | 3 |
singular | ngai | ---- | ngi | nui masculine na feminine |
dual | ngalbe | ngœba | ngipel | palai |
plural | ngœi | ngalpa | ngitha | thana |
Meriam Mìr | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
number | 1 | 1-2 | 2 | 3 |
singular | ka | ---- | ma | e |
non-singular | ki | mi | wa | wi, i |
Kiwai | |||
---|---|---|---|
number | 1 | 2 | 3 |
singular | mai | rai | nowai |
dual | nimoto | rigoto | neito |
trial | nimoibi | rigoibi | neibi |
plural | nimo | rigo | nei |
Urradhi | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
number | 1 | 1-2 | 2 | 3 |
singular | ayu(va) | ---- | antu(va) | ulu(va) |
dual | ampu(la) | ali(va) | ipu(la) | ula(va) |
plural | (as dual) | ana(va) | (as dual) | (as dual) |
Note that most of the Trans Fly languages also have two-gender masculine-feminine systems, though not marked on the pronouns themselves. Wurm 1975:333-334.
However, even though the system has no real surprises for Australian linguistics, it is clear that Kalaw Lagaw Ya has innovated in the 1st and 2nd pronouns, which appear to have the following CA origins:
CA *ngali > ngœy we, not you; and with stem extensions ngalpa you and I/we (old-style singing ngalipa/ngalepa), ngalbai/ngalbe we two (not you), (old style singing ngalebai/ngalibai)
CA *ngana+pulV > ngœba you and I.
The 2nd person dual and plural pronouns are clearly based on forms that literally mean you-two (ngipel) and you-they (ngitha), in the same way as the demonstratives similarly mark the dual and plural (see further below in Nominal Morphology).
The Kalaw Lagaw Ya pronouns and their Australian origins:
KLY | KulY | KY | KKY | Old KY (Kowrareg) |
Proto-Pama–Nyungan origin | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | ngay stem: nga- |
ngai stem: nga- |
ngai stem: nga- |
ngai stem: nga- |
ngai stem: nga- |
*ngayi |
you and I | ngœba | ngœba | ngœba | ngœba | ngœba | *ngana+pulV 'we two, not you' |
we two (not you) | ngalbay | ngalbai | ngalbai/ngalbe | ngalbe | ngalbe | *ngali+ 'you and me, you and us' |
we (incl. you) | ngalpa stem: ngalpu- |
ngalpa stem: ngalpu- |
ngalpa stem: ngalpu- |
ngalpa stem: ngalpa- |
ngalpa stem: ngalpa- |
*ngali+ 'you and me, you and us' |
we (not you) | ngœy stem: ngœlmu- |
ngœi stem: ngœlmu- |
ngœyi stem: ngœymu- |
ngœi stem: ngœimu- |
ngœri stem: ngœri(mu)- |
*ngali 'you and me, you and us' |
you (sing.) | ni | ni | ngi | ngi | ngi | *NHina |
you two | nipel stem: nipe- |
nipel stem: nipe- |
ngipel stem: ngipe- |
ngipel stem: ngipe- |
ngipel stem: ngipe- |
*NHina+pulV |
you (pl.) | nitha stem: nithamu- |
nitha stem: nithamu- |
ngitha stem: ngithamu- |
ngitha stem: ngithamu- |
ngithana stem: ngithana(mu)- |
*NHina + *DHana 'they' |
he | nuy stem: nu- |
nui stem: nu- |
nui stem: nu- |
nui stem: nu- |
nui stem: nu- |
*NHu- |
she | na | na | na | na | na | *NHan- |
they two | palay stem: palamu- |
palai stem: palamu- |
pale stem: palamu- |
palai stem: palamu-, Boigu pale stem: palemu- |
pale stem: palamu- |
*pula |
they | thana stem: thanamu- |
thana stem: thanamu- |
thana stem: thanamu- |
thana stem: thanamu- |
thana stem: thanamu- |
*DHana |
who | nga | nga | nga | nga | nga | *ngaaNH |
what (no independent nominative-accusative form |
mi-, midhi- |
mi- | mi- | mi- | mi- | *miNHA 'food' (?) |
Read more about this topic: Kalaw Lagaw Ya, Pronouns
Famous quotes containing the words linguistic, historical and/or comparison:
“It is merely a linguistic peculiarity, not a logical fact, that we say that is red instead of that reddens, either in the sense of growing, becoming, red, or in the sense of making something else red.”
—John Dewey (18591952)
“The proverbial notion of historical distance consists in our having lost ninety-five of every hundred original facts, so the remaining ones can be arranged however one likes.”
—Robert Musil (18801942)
“Certainly there is not the fight recorded in Concord history, at least, if in the history of America, that will bear a moments comparison with this, whether for the numbers engaged in it, or for the patriotism and heroism displayed.”
—Henry David Thoreau (18171862)