New Naming Convention For Large Numbers
While maintaining the original system of the French mathematician Nicolas Chuquet (1484) for the names of large numbers, Jacques Pelletier promoted milliard for 1012 which had been used earlier by Budaeus. In the late 17th century, milliard was subsequently reduced to 109. This convention is used widely in long scale countries.
|
|
|||||
| Base 10 | Systematics | Chuquet | Peletier | SI Prefix | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 0 | million 0 |
|
|
|
|
| 10 3 | Million 0.5 |
|
|
|
|
| 10 6 | Million 1 |
|
|
|
|
| 10 9 | Million 1.5 |
|
|
|
|
| 10 12 | Million 2 |
|
|
|
|
| 10 15 | Million 2.5 |
|
|
|
|
| 10 18 | Million 3 |
|
|
|
|
| 10 21 | Million 3.5 |
|
|
|
|
| 10 24 | Million 4 |
|
|
|
|
Read more about this topic: Jacques Pelletier Du Mans
Famous quotes containing the words large numbers, naming, convention, large and/or numbers:
“Always in England if you had the type of brain that was capable of understanding T.S. Eliots poetry or Kants logic, you could be sure of finding large numbers of people who would hate you violently.”
—D.J. Taylor (b. 1960)
“The night is itself sleep
And what goes on in it, the naming of the wind,
Our notes to each other, always repeated, always the same.”
—John Ashbery (b. 1927)
“Every one knows about the young man who falls in love with the chorus-girl because she can kick his hat off, and his sisters friends cant or wont. But the youth who marries her, expecting that all her departures from convention will be as agile or as delightful to him as that, is still the classic example of folly.”
—Katharine Fullerton Gerould (18791944)
“A tattered copy of Johnsons large Dictionary was a great delight to me, on account of the specimens of English versifications which I found in the Introduction. I learned them as if they were so many poems. I used to keep this old volume close to my pillow; and I amused myself when I awoke in the morning by reciting its jingling contrasts of iambic and trochaic and dactylic metre, and thinking what a charming occupation it must be to make up verses.”
—Lucy Larcom (18241893)
“The barriers of conventionality have been raised so high, and so strangely cemented by long existence, that the only hope of overthrowing them exists in the union of numbers linked together by common opinion and effort ... the united watchword of thousands would strike at the foundation of the false system and annihilate it.”
—Mme. Ellen Louise Demorest 18241898, U.S. womens magazine editor and womans club movement pioneer. Demorests Illustrated Monthly and Mirror of Fashions, p. 203 (January 1870)