New Naming Convention For Large Numbers
While maintaining the original system of the French mathematician Nicolas Chuquet (1484) for the names of large numbers, Jacques Pelletier promoted milliard for 1012 which had been used earlier by Budaeus. In the late 17th century, milliard was subsequently reduced to 109. This convention is used widely in long scale countries.
|
|
|||||
| Base 10 | Systematics | Chuquet | Peletier | SI Prefix | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 0 | million 0 |
|
|
|
|
| 10 3 | Million 0.5 |
|
|
|
|
| 10 6 | Million 1 |
|
|
|
|
| 10 9 | Million 1.5 |
|
|
|
|
| 10 12 | Million 2 |
|
|
|
|
| 10 15 | Million 2.5 |
|
|
|
|
| 10 18 | Million 3 |
|
|
|
|
| 10 21 | Million 3.5 |
|
|
|
|
| 10 24 | Million 4 |
|
|
|
|
Read more about this topic: Jacques Pelletier Du Mans
Famous quotes containing the words naming, convention, large and/or numbers:
“Husband,
who am I to reject the naming of foods
in a time of famine?”
—Anne Sexton (19281974)
“The metaphor of the king as the shepherd of his people goes back to ancient Egypt. Perhaps the use of this particular convention is due to the fact that, being stupid, affectionate, gregarious, and easily stampeded, the societies formed by sheep are most like human ones.”
—Northrop Frye (b. 1912)
“Switzerland is a small, steep country, much more up and down than sideways, and is all stuck over with large brown hotels built on the cuckoo clock style of architecture.”
—Ernest Hemingway (18991961)
“What culture lacks is the taste for anonymous, innumerable germination. Culture is smitten with counting and measuring; it feels out of place and uncomfortable with the innumerable; its efforts tend, on the contrary, to limit the numbers in all domains; it tries to count on its fingers.”
—Jean Dubuffet (19011985)