Motivation and Formal Statement
Let R be a ring and let U be a simple right R-module. If u is a non-zero element of U, u·R = U (where u·R is the cyclic submodule of U generated by u). Therefore, if u and v are non-zero elements of U, there is an element of R that induces an endomorphism of U transforming u to v. The natural question now is whether this can be generalized to arbitrary (finite) tuples of elements. More precisely, find necessary and sufficient conditions on the tuple (x1, ..., xn) and (y1, ..., yn) separately, so that there is an element of R with the property that xi·r = yi for all i. If D is the set of all R-module endomorphisms of U, then Schur's lemma asserts that D is a division ring, and the Jacobson density theorem answers the question on tuples in the affirmative, provided that the x's are linearly independent over D.
With the above in mind, theorem may be stated this way:
The Jacobson Density Theorem
- Let U be a simple right R-module and write D = End(UR). Let A be any D-linear transformation on U and let X be a finite D-linearly independent subset of U. Then there exists an element r of R such that A(x) = x·r for all x in X.
Read more about this topic: Jacobson Density Theorem
Famous quotes containing the words motivation, formal and/or statement:
“Self-determination has to mean that the leader is your individual gut, and heart, and mind or were talking about power, again, and its rather well-known impurities. Who is really going to care whether you live or die and who is going to know the most intimate motivation for your laughter and your tears is the only person to be trusted to speak for you and to decide what you will or will not do.”
—June Jordan (b. 1939)
“The formal Washington dinner party has all the spontaneity of a Japanese imperial funeral.”
—Simon Hoggart (b. 1946)
“The force of truth that a statement imparts, then, its prominence among the hordes of recorded observations that I may optionally apply to my own life, depends, in addition to the sense that it is argumentatively defensible, on the sense that someone like me, and someone I like, whose voice is audible and who is at least notionally in the same room with me, does or can possibly hold it to be compellingly true.”
—Nicholson Baker (b. 1957)