Isoperimetric Inequality in Higher Dimensions
The isoperimetric theorem generalizes to surfaces in the three-dimensional Euclidean space. Among all simple closed surfaces with given surface area, the sphere encloses a region of maximal volume. An analogous statement holds in Euclidean spaces of any dimension.
In full generality (Federer 1969, §3.2.43), the isoperimetric inequality states that for any set S ⊂ Rn whose closure has finite Lebesgue measure
where M*n-1 is the (n-1)-dimensional Minkowski content, Ln is the n-dimensional Lebesgue measure, and ωn is the volume of the unit ball in Rn. If the boundary of S is rectifiable, then the Minkowski content is the (n-1)-dimensional Hausdorff measure.
The isoperimetric inequality in n-dimensions can be quickly proven by the Brunn-Minkowski inequality (Osserman (1978); Federer (1969, §3.2.43)).
The n-dimensional isoperimetric inequality is equivalent (for sufficiently smooth domains) to the Sobolev inequality on Rn with optimal constant:
for all u ∈ W1,1(Rn).
Read more about this topic: Isoperimetric Inequality
Famous quotes containing the words inequality, higher and/or dimensions:
“Love is a great thing. It is not by chance that in all times and practically among all cultured peoples love in the general sense and the love of a man for his wife are both called love. If love is often cruel or destructive, the reasons lie not in love itself, but in the inequality between people.”
—Anton Pavlovich Chekhov (1860–1904)
“To higher or lower ends, they [the majority of mankind] move too often with something of a sad countenance, with hurried and ignoble gait, becoming, unconsciously, something like thorns, in their anxiety to bear grapes; it being possible for people, in the pursuit of even great ends, to become themselves thin and impoverished in spirit and temper, thus diminishing the sum of perfection in the world, at its very sources.”
—Walter Pater (1839–1894)
“Why is it that many contemporary male thinkers, especially men of color, repudiate the imperialist legacy of Columbus but affirm dimensions of that legacy by their refusal to repudiate patriarchy?”
—bell hooks (b. c. 1955)