Ising Model - Definition

Definition

Given a graph Λ (for example, a d-dimensional lattice), per each lattice site j ∈ Λ there is a discrete variable σj such that σj ∈{+1, −1}. A spin configuration, σ = (σj)j∈Λ is an assignment of spin value to each lattice site.

For any two adjacent sites i, j ∈Λ one has an interaction Jij, and a site i ∈ Λ has an external magnetic field hi. The energy of a configuration σ is given by the Hamiltonian Function

H(\sigma) = - \sum_{<i~j>} J_{ij} \sigma_i \sigma_j -\sum_{j} h_j\sigma_j

where the first sum is over pairs of adjacent spins (every pair is counted once). indicates that sites i and j are nearest neighbors. The configuration probability is given by the Boltzmann distribution with inverse temperature β ≥0:

P_\beta(\sigma) ={e^{-\beta H(\sigma)} \over Z_\beta}, \,

where β = (kBT)-1

and the normalization constant

Z_\beta = \sum_\sigma e^{-\beta H(\sigma)} \,

is the partition function. For a function f of the spins ("observable"), one denotes by

the expectation (mean value) of f.

The configuration probabilities represent the probability of being in a state with configuration σ in equilibrium.

Read more about this topic:  Ising Model

Famous quotes containing the word definition:

    “Mothers often are too easily intimidated by their children’s negative reactions...When the child cries or is unhappy, the mother reads this as meaning that she is a failure. This is why it is so important for a mother to know...that the process of growing up involves by definition things that her child is not going to like. Her job is not to create a bed of roses, but to help him learn how to pick his way through the thorns.”
    —Elaine Heffner (20th century)

    “No man, not even a doctor, ever gives any other definition of what a nurse should be than this—”devoted and obedient.” This definition would do just as well for a porter. It might even do for a horse. It would not do for a policeman.”
    —Florence Nightingale (1820–1910)

    “The man who knows governments most completely is he who troubles himself least about a definition which shall give their essence. Enjoying an intimate acquaintance with all their particularities in turn, he would naturally regard an abstract conception in which these were unified as a thing more misleading than enlightening.”
    —William James (1842–1910)