The Natural Partial Order
An inverse semigroup S possesses a natural partial order relation ≤ (sometimes denoted by ω) which is defined by the following:
for some idempotent e in S. Equivalently,
for some (in general, different) idempotent f in S. In fact, e can be taken to be aa−1 and f to be a−1a.
The natural partial order is compatible with both multiplication and inversion, that is,
and
In a group, this partial order simply reduces to equality, since the identity is the only idempotent. In a symmetric inverse semigroup, the partial order reduces to restriction of mappings, i.e., α ≤ β if, and only if, the domain of α is contained in the domain of β and xα = xβ, for all x in the domain of α.
The natural partial order on an inverse semigroup interacts with Green's relations as follows: if s ≤ t and st, then s = t. Similarly, if st.
On E(S), the natural partial order becomes:
so the product of any two idempotents in S is equal to the lesser of the two, with respect to ≤. If E(S) forms a chain (i.e., E(S) is totally ordered by ≤), then S is a union of groups.
Read more about this topic: Inverse Semigroup
Famous quotes containing the words partial order, natural, partial and/or order:
“Both the man of science and the man of art live always at the edge of mystery, surrounded by it. Both, as a measure of their creation, have always had to do with the harmonization of what is new with what is familiar, with the balance between novelty and synthesis, with the struggle to make partial order in total chaos.... This cannot be an easy life.”
—J. Robert Oppenheimer (1904–1967)
“The whole of natural theology ... resolves itself into one simple, though somewhat ambiguous proposition, That the cause or causes of order in the universe probably bear some remote analogy to human intelligence.”
—David Hume (1711–1776)
“It is characteristic of the epistemological tradition to present us with partial scenarios and then to demand whole or categorical answers as it were.”
—Avrum Stroll (b. 1921)
“An absolute can only be given in an intuition, while all the rest has to do with analysis. We call intuition here the sympathy by which one is transported into the interior of an object in order to coincide with what there is unique and consequently inexpressible in it. Analysis, on the contrary, is the operation which reduces the object to elements already known.”
—Henri Bergson (1859–1941)