Statement of The Theorem
For functions of a single variable, the theorem states that if ƒ is a continuously differentiable function with nonzero derivative at the point a, then ƒ is invertible in a neighborhood of a, the inverse is continuously differentiable, and
where b = ƒ(a).
For functions of more than one variable, the theorem states that if the total derivative of a continuously differentiable function F defined from an open set U of Rn into Rn is invertible at a point p (i.e., the Jacobian determinant of F at p is non-zero), then F is an invertible function near p. That is, an inverse function to F exists in some neighborhood of F(p). Moreover, the inverse function is also continuously differentiable. In the infinite dimensional case it is required that the Fréchet derivative have a bounded inverse at p.
Finally, the theorem says that
where denotes matrix inverse and is the Jacobian matrix of the function G at the point q.
This formula can also be derived from the chain rule. The chain rule states that for functions G and H which have total derivatives at H(p) and p respectively,
Letting G be F -1 and H be F, is the identity function, whose Jacobian matrix is also the identity. In this special case, the formula above can be solved for . Note that the chain rule assumes the existence of total derivative of the inside function H, while the inverse function theorem proves that F -1 has a total derivative at p.
The existence of an inverse function to F is equivalent to saying that the system of n equations yi = Fj(x1,...,xn) can be solved for x1,...,xn in terms of y1,...,yn if we restrict x and y to small enough neighborhoods of p and F(p), respectively.
Read more about this topic: Inverse Function Theorem
Famous quotes containing the words statement of the, statement of, statement and/or theorem:
“Eroticism has its own moral justification because it says that pleasure is enough for me; it is a statement of the individuals sovereignty.”
—Mario Vargas Llosa (b. 1936)
“Eloquence must be grounded on the plainest narrative. Afterwards, it may warm itself until it exhales symbols of every kind and color, speaks only through the most poetic forms; but first and last, it must still be at bottom a biblical statement of fact.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (18031882)
“Most personal correspondence of today consists of letters the first half of which are given over to an indexed statement of why the writer hasnt written before, followed by one paragraph of small talk, with the remainder devoted to reasons why it is imperative that the letter be brought to a close.”
—Robert Benchley (18891945)
“To insure the adoration of a theorem for any length of time, faith is not enough, a police force is needed as well.”
—Albert Camus (19131960)