Fundamental Breach
The courts tried to control and strike down very extreme exclusion clauses, those which excluded liability for very serious breaches of contract. The simple rule now, is that it is a matter of construction whether an exclusion clause covers a fundamental breach which occurred. Lord Denning wanted a ‘rule of law’ approach so that liability for some fundamental breaches of contract could never be excluded no matter how widely the clause was drafted. But Suisse Atlantique Societe d’Armament Maritime SA v NV Rotterdamsche Kolen Centrale 1 AC 361 held that the preferable ‘rule of construction’ approach was to interpret the clause against the party relying on it. In Harbutt’s Plasticine Ltd v Wayne Tank Pump Co Ltd 1 QB 477, Lord Denning MR seized on the judgments ambiguities and resurrected his own rule. But that was stopped at last in…
- Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd AC 827
- Clauses which exempt someone from a serious breach, such as for a term going to the contract’s root (Karsales (Harrow) Ltd v Wallis 1 WLR 936) or a deliberate refusal to perform (Sze Hai Tong Bank Ltd v Rambler Cycle Co Ltd AC 576) must be very expressly excluded.
- Curtis v Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing Co Ltd 1 KB 805, a party cannot rely on an exclusion clause if he has misrepresented its effect.
- Couchman v Hill KB 554, a written exclusion clause can be overridden by express and inconsistent undertakings at the time of the contract.
There is no general power to strike down unreasonable exclusion clauses.
Read more about this topic: Interpreting Contracts In English Law, Exclusion Clauses
Famous quotes containing the words fundamental and/or breach:
“This leads us to note down in our psychological chart of the mass-man of today two fundamental traits: the free expansion of his vital desires, and, therefore, of his personality; and his radical ingratitude towards all that has made possible the ease of his existence. These traits together make up the well-known psychology of the spoilt child.”
—José Ortega Y Gasset (1883–1955)
“Good manners, to those one does not love, are no more a breach of truth, than “your humble servant,” at the bottom of a challenge is; they are universally agreed upon, and understand to be things of course. They are necessary guards of the decency and peace of society.”
—Philip Dormer Stanhope, 4th Earl Chesterfield (1694–1773)