Works
- 1981 : Le Chewing-gum des yeux (French: Chewing Gum for the Eyes)
- 1989 : La Communication victime des marchands
- 1995 : Cómo nos venden la moto, with Noam Chomsky
- 1996 : Nouveaux pouvoirs, nouveaux maîtres du monde (French: New Powers, New World Masters)
- 1997 : Géopolitique du chaos (French: Geopolitics of Chaos)
- 1998 : Internet, el mundo que llega (Spanish: Internet, the Coming World)
- 1998 : Rebeldes, dioses y excluidos (Spanish: Rebels, Gods, and the Excluded), with Mariano Aguirre
- 1999 : La Tyrannie de la communication (French: The Tyranny of Communication)
- 1999 : Geopolítica y comunicación de final de milenio (Spanish: Geopolitics and Communication at the End of the Millennium)
- 2000 : La golosina visual
- 2000 : Propagandes silencieuses
- 2001 : Marcos, la dignité rebelle
- 2002 : La Post-Télévision
- 2002 : Guerres du XXIe siècle (Wars of the 21st Century)
- 2004 : Abécédaire partiel et partial de la mondialisation, with Ramón Chao and Wozniak
- 2006: Fidel Castro: biografía a dos voces (Spanish: Fidel Castro: Biography with Two Voices) also titled Cien horas con Fidel (One Hundred Hours with Fidel)
Read more about this topic: Ignacio Ramonet
Famous quotes containing the word works:
“Now they express
All that’s content to wear a worn-out coat,
All actions done in patient hopelessness,
All that ignores the silences of death,
Thinking no further than the hand can hold,
All that grows old,
Yet works on uselessly with shortened breath.”
—Philip Larkin (1922–1986)
“His character as one of the fathers of the English language would alone make his works important, even those which have little poetical merit. He was as simple as Wordsworth in preferring his homely but vigorous Saxon tongue, when it was neglected by the court, and had not yet attained to the dignity of a literature, and rendered a similar service to his country to that which Dante rendered to Italy.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)
“Most young black females learn to be suspicious and critical of feminist thinking long before they have any clear understanding of its theory and politics.... Without rigorously engaging feminist thought, they insist that racial separatism works best. This attitude is dangerous. It not only erases the reality of common female experience as a basis for academic study; it also constructs a framework in which differences cannot be examined comparatively.”
—bell hooks (b. c. 1955)