House of Representatives (Japan) - Election Results For Major Parties Since 1960

Election Results For Major Parties Since 1960

e • d District vote for candidates by party
Parties 1960 1963 1967 1969 1972 1976 1979 1980 1983 1986 1990 1993 1996 2000 2003 2005 2009
Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) Jiyū Minshutō 57.6% 54.7% 48.8% 47.6% 46.8% 41.8% 44.6% 47.9% 48.9% 49.4% 46.1% 36.7% 38.6% 41.0% 43.9% 47.8% 38.6%
Japan Socialist Party (JSP) Nihon Shakaitō 27.6% 29.0% 27.9% 21.4% 21.9% 20.7% 19.7% 19.3% 19.5% 17.2% 24.4% 15.4%
Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) Minshutō 10.6% 27.6% 36.7% 36.4% 47.4%
New Frontier Party (NFP) Shinshintō (*) 28.0%
(New) Komeito Party (NKP) Kōmeitō 5.4% 10.9% 8.5% 11.0% 9.8% 9.0% 10.1% 9.4% 8.0% 8.1% 2.0% 1.5% 1.4% 1.1%
Japanese Communist Party (JCP) Nihon Kyōsantō 2.9% 4.0% 4.8% 6.8% 10.5% 10.4% 10.4% 9.8% 9.3% 8.8% 8.0% 7.7% 12.6% 12.1% 8.1% 7.2% 4.2%
Liberal Party Jiyūtō 3.4%
Social Democratic Party (SDP) Shakai Minshutō 2.2% 3.8% 2.9% 1.5% 1.9%
Democratic Socialist Party (DSP) Minshatō 8.8% 7.4% 7.4% 7.7% 7.0% 6.3% 6.8% 6.6% 7.3% 6.4% 4.8% 3.5%

(*) NFP-precursors Japan Renewal Party (Shinseitō) & Japan New Party (Nihon Shintō)

Note: Before the 1994 electoral reform all districts but one (Amami electoral district 1955–1990) were multi-member constituencies.

e • d Proportional block vote by party
Parties 1996 2000 2003 2005 2009
Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) Jiyū Minshutō 32.8% 28.3% 35.0% 38.1% 26.7%
Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) Minshutō 16.1% 25.2% 37.4% 31.0% 42.4%
New Frontier Party (NFP) Shinshintō 28.0%
New Komeito Party (NKP) Kōmeitō 13.0% 14.8% 13.3% 11.4%
Japanese Communist Party (JCP) Nihon Kyōsantō 13.1% 11.2% 7.8% 7.2% 7.0%
Liberal Party Jiyūtō 11.0%
Social Democratic Party (SDP) Shakai Minshutō 6.4% 9.4% 5.1% 5.5% 4.2%

Read more about this topic:  House Of Representatives (Japan)

Famous quotes containing the words election, results, major and/or parties:

    Last evening attended Croghan Lodge International Order of Odd Fellows. Election of officers. Chosen Noble Grand. These social organizations have a number of good results. All who attend are educated in self-government. This in a marked way. They bind society together. The well-to-do and the poor should be brought together as much as possible. The separation into classes—castes—is our danger. It is the danger of all civilizations.
    Rutherford Birchard Hayes (1822–1893)

    How can you tell if you discipline effectively? Ask yourself if your disciplinary methods generally produce lasting results in a manner you find acceptable. Whether your philosophy is democratic or autocratic, whatever techniques you use—reasoning, a “star” chart, time-outs, or spanking—if it doesn’t work, it’s not effective.
    Stanley Turecki (20th century)

    Power is not of a man. Wealth does not center in the person of the wealthy. Celebrity is not inherent in any personality. To be celebrated, to be wealthy, to have power requires access to major institutions.
    C. Wright Mills (1916–1962)

    Men are to be guided only by their self-interests. Good government is a good balancing of these; and, except a keen eye and appetite for self-interest, requires no virtue in any quarter. To both parties it is emphatically a machine: to the discontented, a “taxing- machine;” to the contented, a “machine for securing property.” Its duties and its faults are not those of a father, but of an active parish-constable.
    Thomas Carlyle (1795–1881)