Grinnell College - Endowment

Endowment

Grinnell College is the 49th wealthiest educational institution, of any size, in North America with a larger endowment than many research universities such as Georgetown University, Tufts University and UCLA. The $1.26 billion endowment as of the end of FY 2010 – the fifth-largest among United States liberal arts colleges – is evident in the college's facilities, art collections, and generous financial aid programs. Under the stewardship of Warren Buffett and Joseph Rosenfield, the college has adopted an opportunistic and innovative strategy in managing its assets. In 1976, Grinnell's capital fund acquired a TV station, WDTN in Dayton, Ohio, one of many investments that were unprecedented in their time for a college endowment. (Grinnell would sell the station in 1981.) Another innovative move that significantly increased the endowment occurred when Rosenfield and the college contributed to the founding of Intel—an investment exceeding 10% of the venture capital raised to start the semiconductor company (Intel co-founder Robert Noyce was a Grinnell alumnus).

Warren Buffett played a visible role in growing the endowment at Grinnell, where he served as a trustee from 1968 until 2011. In 2011 he decided to step down from all boards not relating to Berkshire Hathaway.

A campaign is currently under way to create more transparency and social responsibility in the endowment's investments.

Read more about this topic:  Grinnell College

Famous quotes containing the word endowment:

    The parent must not give in to his desire to try to create the child he would like to have, but rather help the child to develop—in his own good time—to the fullest, into what he wishes to be and can be, in line with his natural endowment and as the consequence of his unique life in history.
    Bruno Bettelheim (20th century)

    ... it matters not what natural endowment a race may have if it prostitutes itself to the service of death.
    Rebecca West (1892–1983)

    I wish more and more that health were studied half as much as disease is. Why, with all the endowment of research against cancer is no study made of those who are free from cancer? Why not inquire what foods they eat, what habits of body and mind they cultivate? And why never study animals in health and natural surroundings? why always sickened and in an environment of strangeness and artificiality?
    Sarah N. Cleghorn (1976–1959)