Grand Canonical Ensemble - Quantum Mechanical Ensemble

Quantum Mechanical Ensemble

An ensemble of quantum mechanical systems is described by a density matrix. In a suitable representation, a density matrix ρ takes the form

where pk is the probability of a system chosen at random from the ensemble will be in the microstate

So the trace of ρ, denoted by Tr(ρ), is 1. This is the quantum mechanical analogue of the fact that the accessible region of the classical phase space has total probability 1.

It is also assumed that the ensemble in question is stationary, i.e. it does not change in time. Therefore, by Liouville's theorem, = 0, i.e. ρH = Hρ where H is the Hamiltonian of the system. Thus the density matrix describing ρ is diagonal in the energy representation.

Suppose

where Ei is the energy of the i-th energy eigenstate. If a system i-th energy eigenstate has ni number of particles, the corresponding observable, the number operator, is given by

From classical considerations, we know that the state

has (unnormalized) probability

Thus the grand canonical ensemble is the mixed state

\rho = \sum_i p_i |\psi_i \rangle \langle \psi_i| = \sum_i e^{-\beta (E_i - \mu n_i)} |\psi_i \rangle \langle \psi_i| = e^{- \beta (H - \mu N)}.

The grand partition, the normalizing constant for Tr(ρ) to be 1, is

Remember that for the grand partition, the states are states with multiple particles in Fock space, and the trace sums over all of them. In the special case of a non-interacting system, the grand partition can be simplified and expressed in terms of the eigenvalues of the single-particle Hamiltonian; after all, the eigenvalues of the multiple-particle Hamiltonian will have the form

weighting each energy state with the number of particles in that state.

Read more about this topic:  Grand Canonical Ensemble

Famous quotes containing the words quantum and/or mechanical:

    “But how is one to make a scientist understand that there is something unalterably deranged about differential calculus, quantum theory, or the obscene and so inanely liturgical ordeals of the precession of the equinoxes.”
    —Antonin Artaud (1896–1948)

    “The correct rate of speed in innovating changes in long-standing social customs has not yet been determined by even the most expert of the experts. Personally I am beginning to think there is more danger in lagging than in speeding up cultural change to keep pace with mechanical change.”
    —Mary Barnett Gilson (1877–?)