Goldstone's Argument
The principle behind Goldstone's argument is that the ground state is not unique. Normally, by current conservation, the charge operator for any symmetry current is time-independent,
Acting with the charge operator on the vacuum either annihilates the vacuum, if that is symmetric; else, if not, as is the case in spontaneous symmetry breaking, it produces a zero-frequency state out of it, through its shift transformation feature illustrated above. (Actually, here, the charge itself is ill-defined; but its better behaved commutators with fields, so, then, the transformation shifts, are still time-invariant, d〈δφg〉/dt = 0 .)
So, if the vacuum is not invariant under the symmetry, action of the charge operator produces a state which is different from the vacuum chosen, but which has zero frequency. This is a long-wavelength oscillation of a field which is nearly stationary: there are states with zero frequency, so that the theory cannot have a mass gap.
This argument is clarified by taking the limit carefully. If an approximate charge operator is applied to the vacuum,
a state with approximately vanishing time derivative is produced,
Assuming a nonvanishing mass gap m0, the frequency of any state like the above, which is orthogonal to the vacuum, is at least m0,
Letting A become large leads to a contradiction. Consequently m0 = 0.
This argument fails, however, when the symmetry is gauged, because then the symmetry generator is only performing a gauge transformation. A gauge transformed state is the same exact state, so that acting with a symmetry generator does not get one out of the vacuum.
Read more about this topic: Goldstone Boson
Famous quotes containing the word argument:
“My argument is that War makes rattling good history; but Peace is poor reading.”
—Thomas Hardy (18401928)