Golden Ratio Base - Representing Rational Numbers As Golden Ratio Base Numbers

Representing Rational Numbers As Golden Ratio Base Numbers

Every non-negative rational number can be represented as a recurring base-φ expansion, as can any non-negative element of the field Q = Q + √5Q, the field generated by the rational numbers and √5. Conversely any recurring (or terminating) base-φ expansion is a non-negative element of Q. Some examples (with spaces added for emphasis):

  • 1/2 ≈ 0.010 010 010 010 ... φ
  • 1/3 ≈ 0.00101000 00101000 00101000... φ
  • √5 = 10.1φ
  • 2+(1/13)√5 ≈ 10.010 1000100010101000100010000000 1000100010101000100010000000 1000100010101000100010000000 ...φ

The justification that a rational gives a recurring expansion is analogous to the equivalent proof for a base-n numeration system (n=2,3,4,...). Essentially in base-φ long division there are only a finite number of possible remainders, and so once there must be a recurring pattern. For example with 1/2 = 1/10.01φ = 100φ/1001φ long division looks like this (note that base-φ subtraction may be hard to follow at first):

.0 1 0 0 1 ________________________ 1 0 0 1 ) 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 trade: 10000 = 1100 = 1011 ------- so 10000-1001 = 1011-1001 = 10 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 ------- etc.

The converse is also true, in that a number with a recurring base-φ; representation is an element of the field Q. This follows from the observation that a recurring representation with period k involves a geometric series with ratio φ-k, which will sum to an element of Q.

Read more about this topic:  Golden Ratio Base

Famous quotes containing the words representing, rational, numbers, golden, ratio and/or base:

    He who has learned what is commonly considered the whole art of painting, that is, the art of representing any natural object faithfully, has as yet only learned the language by which his thoughts are to be expressed.
    John Ruskin (1819–1900)

    Every rational creature has all nature for his dowry and estate. It is his, if he will. He may divest himself of it; he may creep into a corner, and abdicate his kingdom, as most men do, but he is entitled to the world by his constitution.
    Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)

    Publishers are notoriously slothful about numbers, unless they’re attached to dollar signs—unlike journalists, quarterbacks, and felony criminal defendents who tend to be keenly aware of numbers at all times.
    Hunter S. Thompson (b. 1939)

    The golden mean in ethics, as in physics, is the centre of the system and that about which all revolve, and though to a distant and plodding planet it be an uttermost extreme, yet one day, when that planet’s year is completed, it will be found to be central.
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    Official dignity tends to increase in inverse ratio to the importance of the country in which the office is held.
    Aldous Huxley (1894–1963)

    You see how this House of Commons has begun to verify all the ill prophecies that were made of it—low, vulgar, meddling with everything, assuming universal competency, and flattering every base passion—and sneering at everything noble refined and truly national. The direct tyranny will come on by and by, after it shall have gratified the multitude with the spoil and ruin of the old institutions of the land.
    Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772–1834)