GNS Theory - Other Terms

Other Terms

The GNS theory incorporates Jonathan Tweet's three forms of task resolution that determine the outcome of an event. Edwards said that an RPG should use a task resolution system or combination of systems that is most appropriate for that game's GNS perspective. The three task resolution forms are:

  • Drama, the participants decide the results, the requirements of the plot being the determining factor (e.g., Houses of the Blooded )
  • Fortune, chance decides the results (e.g., by using dice)
  • Karma, a fixed value decides the results (e.g., by comparing stats - e.g. Nobilis )

Edwards has said that the main reason he changed the name of the Threefold Model's "Drama" type to "Narrativism" for GNS was to avoid confusion with Drama as a task resolution system.

The GNS Theory identifies five elements of role-playing that all players recognize:

  • Character, a fictional person
  • Color, details that provide atmosphere
  • Setting, location (in space and time)
  • Situation, the dilemma
  • System, determines how in-game events unfold

It also explains four Stances the player can have in making decisions for their character:

  • Actor, decides based on what their character would want and know
  • Author, decides based on what they as a player want for their character and then retroactively explains why their character made that decision
  • Director, makes decisions that affect the environment rather than a character (usually represented by a game master in an RPG)
  • Pawn, decides based on what they as a player want for their character without bothering to explain why their character would make that decision

Read more about this topic:  GNS Theory

Famous quotes containing the word terms:

    “The great pagan world of which Egypt and Greece were the last living terms ... once had a vast and perhaps perfect science of its own, a science in terms of life. In our era this science crumbled into magic and charlatanry. But even wisdom crumbles.”
    —D.H. (David Herbert)

    “My father and I were always on the most distant terms when I was a boy—a sort of armed neutrality, so to speak. At irregular intervals this neutrality was broken, and suffering ensued; but I will be candid enough to say that the breaking and the suffering were always divided up with strict impartiality between us—which is to say, my father did the breaking, and I did the suffering.”
    —Mark Twain [Samuel Langhorne Clemens] (1835–1910)