Special Linear Group
The special linear group, SL(n,F), is the group of all matrices with determinant 1. They are special in that they lie on a subvariety — they satisfy a polynomial equation (as the determinant is a polynomial in the entries). Matrices of this type form a group as the determinant of the product of two matrices is the product of the determinants of each matrix. SL(n, F) is a normal subgroup of GL(n,F).
If we write F× for the multiplicative group of F (excluding 0), then the determinant is a group homomorphism
- det: GL(n,F) → F×.
that is surjective and its kernel is the special linear group. Therefore, by the first isomorphism theorem, GL(n,F)/SL(n,F) is isomorphic to F×. In fact, GL(n,F) can be written as a semidirect product:
- GL(n,F) = SL(n,F) ⋊ F×
When F is R or C, SL(n,F) is a Lie subgroup of GL(n,F) of dimension n2 − 1. The Lie algebra of SL(n,F) consists of all n×n matrices over F with vanishing trace. The Lie bracket is given by the commutator.
The special linear group SL(n,R) can be characterized as the group of volume and orientation preserving linear transformations of Rn.
The group SL(n,C) is simply connected while SL(n,R) is not. SL(n,R) has the same fundamental group as GL+(n, R), that is, Z for n=2 and Z2 for n>2.
Read more about this topic: General Linear Group
Famous quotes containing the words special and/or group:
“The very best reason parents are so special . . . is because we are the holders of a priceless gift, a gift we received from countless generations we never knew, a gift that only we now possess and only we can give to our children. That unique gift, of course, is the gift of ourselves. Whatever we can do to give that gift, and to help others receive it, is worth the challenge of all our human endeavor.”
—Fred Rogers (20th century)
“Unless a group of workers know their work is under surveillance, that they are being rated as fairly as human beings, with the fallibility that goes with human judgment, can rate them, and that at least an attempt is made to measure their worth to an organization in relative terms, they are likely to sink back on length of service as the sole reason for retention and promotion.”
—Mary Barnett Gilson (1877–?)