Disadvantages
Several large North American municipalities have attempted zero-fare systems, but many of these implementations have been unsuccessful. A 2002 Department of Transport report suggests that, while transit ridership does tend to increase, there are also some serious disadvantages to converting to fare-free operation:
- A sharp increase in vandalism and hooliganism
- Transit vehicles turning into de facto homeless shelters
- In large transit systems, significant revenue shortfalls
- A significant increase in driver complaints and staff turnover, even though farebox-related arguments are all but eliminated
- Slower service overall (not collecting fares has the effect of speeding boarding, but increased crowding tends to swamp out this effect)
- Declines in schedule adherence
- Increased costs in security and vehicle-maintenance
This report also suggests that, while ridership does increase overall, the ultimate goal of reducing emissions by enticing drivers to take transit instead is rarely met: in fact, because fare-free systems tend to attract large numbers of hooligans, vagrants and other "problem riders", zero-fare systems often have the effect of frightening potential riders back into their cars—the exact opposite of the desired effect.
Read more about this topic: Free Public Transport