First Derivative Test - Precise Statement of First Derivative Test

Precise Statement of First Derivative Test

The first derivative test depends on the "increasing-decreasing test", which is itself ultimately a consequence of the mean value theorem.

Suppose f is a real-valued function of a real variable defined on some interval containing the critical point x. Further suppose that f is continuous at x and differentiable on some open interval containing x, except possibly at x itself.

  • If there exists a positive number r such that for every y in (x - r, x] we have f'(y) ≥ 0, and for every y in [x, x + r) we have f'(y) ≤ 0, then f has a local maximum at x.
  • If there exists a positive number r such that for every y in (x - r, x) we have f'(y) ≤ 0, and for every y in (x, x + r) we have f'(y) ≥ 0, then f has a local minimum at x.
  • If there exists a positive number r such that for every y in (x - r, x) ∪ (x, x + r) we have f'(y) > 0, or if there exists a positive number r such that for every y in (x - r, x) ∪ (x, x + r) we have f'(y) < 0, then f has neither a local maximum nor a local minimum at x.
  • If none of the above conditions hold, then the test fails. (Such a condition is not vacuous; there are functions that satisfy none of the first three conditions.)

Again, corresponding to the comments in the section on monotonicity properites, note that in the first two cases, the inequality is not required to be strict, while in the third case, strict inequality is required.

Read more about this topic:  First Derivative Test

Famous quotes containing the words precise, statement, derivative and/or test:

    I know if I wake up cold,

    and go out into the clear spring night,
    still dark and precise with stars,
    I will feel the wind coming down hard
    like his hand, in fever, on my forehead.
    Stanley Plumly (b. 1939)

    After the first powerful plain manifesto
    The black statement of pistons, without more fuss
    But gliding like a queen, she leaves the station.
    Stephen Spender (1909–1995)

    When we say “science” we can either mean any manipulation of the inventive and organizing power of the human intellect: or we can mean such an extremely different thing as the religion of science the vulgarized derivative from this pure activity manipulated by a sort of priestcraft into a great religious and political weapon.
    Wyndham Lewis (1882–1957)

    In my utter impotence to test the authenticity of the report of my senses, to know whether the impressions they make on me correspond with outlying objects, what difference does it make, whether Orion is up there in heaven, or some god paints the image in the firmament of the soul?
    Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)