Precise Statement of First Derivative Test
The first derivative test depends on the "increasing-decreasing test", which is itself ultimately a consequence of the mean value theorem.
Suppose f is a real-valued function of a real variable defined on some interval containing the critical point x. Further suppose that f is continuous at x and differentiable on some open interval containing x, except possibly at x itself.
- If there exists a positive number r such that for every y in (x - r, x] we have f'(y) ≥ 0, and for every y in [x, x + r) we have f'(y) ≤ 0, then f has a local maximum at x.
- If there exists a positive number r such that for every y in (x - r, x) we have f'(y) ≤ 0, and for every y in (x, x + r) we have f'(y) ≥ 0, then f has a local minimum at x.
- If there exists a positive number r such that for every y in (x - r, x) ∪ (x, x + r) we have f'(y) > 0, or if there exists a positive number r such that for every y in (x - r, x) ∪ (x, x + r) we have f'(y) < 0, then f has neither a local maximum nor a local minimum at x.
- If none of the above conditions hold, then the test fails. (Such a condition is not vacuous; there are functions that satisfy none of the first three conditions.)
Again, corresponding to the comments in the section on monotonicity properites, note that in the first two cases, the inequality is not required to be strict, while in the third case, strict inequality is required.
Read more about this topic: First Derivative Test
Famous quotes containing the words precise, statement, derivative and/or test:
“The opera isnt over till the fat lady sings.”
—Anonymous.
A modern proverb along the lines of dont count your chickens before theyre hatched. This form of words has no precise origin, though both Bartletts Familiar Quotations (16th ed., 1992)
“If we do take statements to be the primary bearers of truth, there seems to be a very simple answer to the question, what is it for them to be true: for a statement to be true is for things to be as they are stated to be.”
—J.L. (John Langshaw)
“When we say science we can either mean any manipulation of the inventive and organizing power of the human intellect: or we can mean such an extremely different thing as the religion of science the vulgarized derivative from this pure activity manipulated by a sort of priestcraft into a great religious and political weapon.”
—Wyndham Lewis (18821957)
“Wild roses, at your back porch, break their blood,
And bud to test surprises of sea air,”
—Howard Moss (b. 1922)