Effects
The effect of a system based on single seat constituencies is that the larger parties gain a disproportionately large share of seats, while smaller parties are left with a disproportionately small share of seats. For example, the 2005 UK General election results in Great Britain were as follows:
Seats |
Seats % | Votes % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Labour Party | 355 | 56.5 | 36.1 | 9,552,436 |
Conservative Party | 198 | 31.5 | 33.2 | 8,782,192 |
Liberal Democrats | 62 | 9.9 | 22.6 | 5,985,454 |
Scottish National Party | 6 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 412,267 |
Plaid Cymru | 3 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 174,838 |
Others | 4 | 0.6 | 5.7 | 1,523,716 |
628 | 26,430,908 |
It can be seen that Labour took a majority of seats, 57%, with only 36% of the vote. The largest two parties took 69% of votes and 88% of seats. Meanwhile, the smaller Liberal Democrat party took over a fifth of votes but only about a tenth of the seats in parliament.
Read more about this topic: First-past-the-post Voting
Famous quotes containing the word effects:
“Like the effects of industrial pollution ... the AIDS crisis is evidence of a world in which nothing important is regional, local, limited; in which everything that can circulate does, and every problem is, or is destined to become, worldwide.”
—Susan Sontag (b. 1933)
“Consider what effects which might conceivably have practical bearings we conceive the object of our conception to have. Then our conception of these effects is the whole of our conception of the object.”
—Charles Sanders Peirce (18391914)
“Virtues are not emotions. Emotions are movements of appetite, virtues dispositions of appetite towards movement. Moreover emotions can be good or bad, reasonable or unreasonable; whereas virtues dispose us only to good. Emotions arise in the appetite and are brought into conformity with reason; virtues are effects of reason achieving themselves in reasonable movements of the appetites. Balanced emotions are virtues effect, not its substance.”
—Thomas Aquinas (c. 12251274)