Calculus of Finite Differences
The forward difference can be considered as a difference operator, which maps the function f to Δh. This operator amounts to
where Th is the shift operator with step h, defined by, and I is the identity operator.
The finite difference of higher orders can be defined in recursive manner as or, in operator notation, Another equivalent definition is
The difference operator Δh is a linear operator and it satisfies a special Leibniz rule indicated above, Δh(f(x)g(x)) = (Δhf(x)) g(x+h) + f(x) (Δhg(x)). Similar statements hold for the backward and central differences.
Formally applying the Taylor series with respect to h, yields the formula
where D denotes the continuum derivative operator, mapping f to its derivative f'. The expansion is valid when both sides act on analytic functions, for sufficiently small h. Thus, Th=eD, and formally inverting the exponential yields
This formula holds in the sense that both operators give the same result when applied to a polynomial.
Even for analytic functions, the series on the right is not guaranteed to converge; it may be an asymptotic series. However, it can be used to obtain more accurate approximations for the derivative. For instance, retaining the first two terms of the series yields the second-order approximation to f’(x) mentioned at the end of the section Higher-order differences.
The analogous formulas for the backward and central difference operators are
The calculus of finite differences is related to the umbral calculus of combinatorics. This remarkably systematic correspondence is due to the identity of the commutators of the umbral quantities to their continuum analogs (h→0 limits),
A large number of formal differential relations of standard calculus involving functions f(x) thus map systematically to umbral finite-difference analogs involving f(xTh−1).
For instance, the umbral analog of a monomial xn is a generalization of the above falling factorial (Pochhammer k-symbol), so that
hence the above Newton interpolation formula (by matching coefficients in the expansion of an arbitrary function f(x) in such symbols), and so on.
For example, the umbral sine is
As in the continuum limit, the eigenfunction of also happens to be an exponential,
and hence Fourier sums of continuum functions are readily mapped to umbral Fourier sums faithfully, i.e., involving the same Fourier coefficients multiplying these umbral basis exponentials. This umbral exponential thus amounts to the exponential generating function of the Pochhammer symbols.
Thus, for instance, the Dirac delta function maps to its umbral correspondent, the cardinal sine function,
and so forth. Difference equations can often be solved with techniques very similar to those for solving differential equations.
The inverse operator of the forward difference operator, so then the umbral integral, is the indefinite sum or antidifference operator.
Read more about this topic: Finite Difference
Famous quotes containing the words calculus of, calculus, finite and/or differences:
“I try to make a rough music, a dance of the mind, a calculus of the emotions, a driving beat of praise out of the pain and mystery that surround me and become me. My poems are meant to make your mind get up and shout.”
—Judith Johnson Sherwin (b. 1936)
“I try to make a rough music, a dance of the mind, a calculus of the emotions, a driving beat of praise out of the pain and mystery that surround me and become me. My poems are meant to make your mind get up and shout.”
—Judith Johnson Sherwin (b. 1936)
“Sisters define their rivalry in terms of competition for the gold cup of parental love. It is never perceived as a cup which runneth over, rather a finite vessel from which the more one sister drinks, the less is left for the others.”
—Elizabeth Fishel (20th century)
“I may be able to spot arrowheads on the desert but a refrigerator is a jungle in which I am easily lost. My wife, however, will unerringly point out that the cheese or the leftover roast is hiding right in front of my eyes. Hundreds of such experiences convince me that men and women often inhabit quite different visual worlds. These are differences which cannot be attributed to variations in visual acuity. Man and women simply have learned to use their eyes in very different ways.”
—Edward T. Hall (b. 1914)