Faro Shuffle - Group Theory Aspects

Group Theory Aspects

In mathematics, a perfect shuffle can be considered to be an element of the symmetric group.

More generally, in, the perfect shuffle is the permutation that splits the set into 2 piles and interleaves them:

\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & \cdots \\ 1 & n+1 & 2 & n+2 & \cdots \end{pmatrix}

Formally, it sends

k \mapsto \begin{cases} 2k-1 & k\leq n\\ 2(k-n) & k> n \end{cases}

Analogously, the -perfect shuffle permutation is the element of that splits the set into k piles and interleaves them.

The -perfect shuffle, denote it, is the composition of the -perfect shuffle with an -cycle, so the sign of is:

The sign is thus 4-periodic:

\mbox{sgn}(\rho_n) = (-1)^{\lfloor n/2 \rfloor} = \begin{cases} +1 & n \equiv 0,1 \pmod{4}\\ -1 & n \equiv 2,3 \pmod{4} \end{cases}

The first few perfect shuffles are: and are trivial, and is the transposition .

Read more about this topic:  Faro Shuffle

Famous quotes containing the words group, theory and/or aspects:

    “A little group of wilful men reflecting no opinion but their own have rendered the great Government of the United States helpless and contemptible.”
    —Woodrow Wilson (1856–1924)

    “There is in him, hidden deep-down, a great instinctive artist, and hence the makings of an aristocrat. In his muddled way, held back by the manacles of his race and time, and his steps made uncertain by a guiding theory which too often eludes his own comprehension, he yet manages to produce works of unquestionable beauty and authority, and to interpret life in a manner that is poignant and illuminating.”
    —H.L. (Henry Lewis)

    “Grammar is a tricky, inconsistent thing. Being the backbone of speech and writing, it should, we think, be eminently logical, make perfect sense, like the human skeleton. But, of course, the skeleton is arbitrary, too. Why twelve pairs of ribs rather than eleven or thirteen? Why thirty-two teeth? It has something to do with evolution and functionalism—but only sometimes, not always. So there are aspects of grammar that make good, logical sense, and others that do not.”
    —John Simon (b. 1925)