Fallacies of Definition - Overly Broad or Narrow Definitions

Overly Broad or Narrow Definitions

A definition is no good if it defines its subject with overly wide or narrow parameters. For example, "a shape with four sides of equal length" is not a good definition for 'square'. Why? Not only squares have four sides of equal length; rhombi do as well. This is proven by identifying not only the term being defined, but also the conditions in the definition. Likewise, defining a 'rectangle' as "a shape with four perpendicular sides of equal length" is not valid because it is too narrow.

Read more about this topic:  Fallacies Of Definition

Famous quotes containing the words overly, broad, narrow and/or definitions:

    “I’m not an overly ambitious person; I don’t feel like I have to excel.”
    —Chris Evert (b. 1954)

    “I do not hesitate to read ... all good books in translations. What is really best in any book is translatable—any real insight or broad human sentiment.”
    —Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)

    “A narrow Fellow in the Grass
    Occasionally rides—”
    —Emily Dickinson (1830–1886)

    “The loosening, for some people, of rigid role definitions for men and women has shown that dads can be great at calming babies—if they take the time and make the effort to learn how. It’s that time and effort that not only teaches the dad how to calm the babies, but also turns him into a parent, just as the time and effort the mother puts into the babies turns her into a parent.”
    —Pamela Patrick Novotny (20th century)