Euler's Criterion - Proof

Proof

The proof uses fact that the residue classes modulo a prime number are a field. See the article prime field for more details. The fact that there are (p − 1)/2 quadratic residues and the same number of nonresidues (mod p) is proved in the article quadratic residue.

Fermat's little theorem says that


a^{p-1}\equiv 1 \pmod p.

This can be written as


(a^{\tfrac{p-1}{2}}-1)(a^{\tfrac{p-1}{2}}+1)\equiv 0 \pmod p.

Since the integers mod p form a field, one or the other of these factors must be congruent to zero.

Now if a is a quadratic residue, ax2,


a^{\tfrac{p-1}{2}}\equiv{x^2}^{\tfrac{p-1}{2}}\equiv x^{p-1}\equiv1\pmod p.

So every quadratic residue (mod p) makes the first factor zero.

Lagrange's theorem says that there can be no more than (p − 1)/2 values of a that make the first factor zero. But it is known that there are (p − 1)/2 distinct quadratic residues (mod p). Therefore they are precisely the residue classes that make the first factor zero. The other (p − 1)/2 residue classes, the nonresidues, must be the ones making the second factor zero. This is Euler's criterion.

Read more about this topic:  Euler's Criterion

Famous quotes containing the word proof:

    War is a beastly business, it is true, but one proof we are human is our ability to learn, even from it, how better to exist.
    M.F.K. Fisher (1908–1992)

    The source of Pyrrhonism comes from failing to distinguish between a demonstration, a proof and a probability. A demonstration supposes that the contradictory idea is impossible; a proof of fact is where all the reasons lead to belief, without there being any pretext for doubt; a probability is where the reasons for belief are stronger than those for doubting.
    Andrew Michael Ramsay (1686–1743)

    From whichever angle one looks at it, the application of racial theories remains a striking proof of the lowered demands of public opinion upon the purity of critical judgment.
    Johan Huizinga (1872–1945)