Calculating The Equation of Time
As noted in the introduction to this article, for many purposes the equation of time is obtained by looking it up in a published table of values or on a graph. For dates in the past, such tables are produced either from measurements done at the time, or by calculations. Of course for dates in the future, tables can only be prepared from calculations. Also, in devices such as computer-controlled heliostats, the computer is often programmed to calculate the equation of time whenever it is needed, instead of looking it up. Two types of calculation are currently in use, numerical and analytical. The former are based on numerical integration of the differential equations of motion that include all significant gravitational interactions and relativistic effects. The results are accurate to better than 1 second of time and form the basis for modern almanac data. The later are based on the known solution of the equations of motion that include only the gravitational interaction between the Sun and Earth. These produce results that are not as accurate as the former, but they can be understood more easily and the equations illustrate the functional dependence on the governing parameters. Their accuracy can be improved by including small corrections, but in the process concurrent increases in complexity are incurred.
The following discussion describes a simple yet reasonably accurate (agreeing with Almanac data to within 3 seconds of time over a wide range of years) algorithm for calculating the equation of time that is well known to astronomers. It also shows how to obtain a simple approximate formula (accurate to within 1 minute of time over a large time interval), that can be easily evaluated with a calculator and provides the simple explanation of the phenomonon that was utilized previously in this article.
Read more about this topic: Equation Of Time
Famous quotes containing the words calculating the, calculating, equation and/or time:
“[The] elderly and timid single gentleman in Paris ... never drove down the Champs Elysees without expecting an accident, and commonly witnessing one; or found himself in the neighborhood of an official without calculating the chances of a bomb. So long as the rates of progress held good, these bombs would double in force and number every ten years.”
—Henry Brooks Adams (1838–1918)
“[The] elderly and timid single gentleman in Paris ... never drove down the Champs Elysees without expecting an accident, and commonly witnessing one; or found himself in the neighborhood of an official without calculating the chances of a bomb. So long as the rates of progress held good, these bombs would double in force and number every ten years.”
—Henry Brooks Adams (1838–1918)
“Jail sentences have many functions, but one is surely to send a message about what our society abhors and what it values. This week, the equation was twofold: female infidelity twice as bad as male abuse, the life of a woman half as valuable as that of a man. The killing of the woman taken in adultery has a long history and survives today in many cultures. One of those is our own.”
—Anna Quindlen (b. 1952)
“Science is unflinchingly deterministic, and it has begun to force its determinism into morals. On some shining tomorrow a psychoanalyst may be put into the box to prove that perjury is simply a compulsion neurosis, like beating time with the foot at a concert or counting the lampposts along the highway.”
—H.L. (Henry Lewis)