English Subjunctive - Historical Subjunctive Forms

Historical Subjunctive Forms

The first table below shows the present and past subjunctive endings in use at various stages of the development of English: in Old English, Middle English, Early Modern English and Modern English. Forms which differ from the corresponding indicative are bolded. denotes zero ending.

Present tense Past tense
Singular Plural Singular Plural
First person Second person Third person First & third person Second person
Old English -e -e -e -en -d-e -d-e -d-on
Middle English -e -e -e -e(n) ? ? -d-e(n)
Early Modern English -d -d -d
Modern English

For comparison, the corresponding indicative endings are also given:

Present tense Past tense
Singular Plural Singular Plural
First person Second person Third person First & third person Second person
Old English -e -st -eþ -aþ -d-e -d-est -d-on
Middle English -e, -Ø -st, -est -th, -s -e(n) -d(e) -d-st -d-e(n)
Early Modern English -est, -st -s, -th -d -d-st -d
Modern English -s -d -d -d

The irregular verb be has a larger number of distinct forms, these being derived from different stems (a case of suppletion). See the Wiktionary articles on be, am, is, were, etc.

As the tables show, in Early Modern English the past subjunctive was distinguishable from the past indicative not only in the verb to be (as in Modern English), but also in the informal second-person singular (thou form) of all verbs. For example: indicative thou sattest, but subjunctive thou sat. The -(e)st ending was also absent in principle in the present subjunctive, although it was sometimes nonetheless added; for example, thou beest appears frequently as a present subjunctive in the works of Shakespeare and some of his contemporaries.

Read more about this topic:  English Subjunctive

Famous quotes containing the words historical and/or forms:

    By contrast with history, evolution is an unconscious process. Another, and perhaps a better way of putting it would be to say that evolution is a natural process, history a human one.... Insofar as we treat man as a part of nature—for instance in a biological survey of evolution—we are precisely not treating him as a historical being. As a historically developing being, he is set over against nature, both as a knower and as a doer.
    Owen Barfield (b. 1898)

    Media mystifications should not obfuscate a simple, perceivable fact; Black teenage girls do not create poverty by having babies. Quite the contrary, they have babies at such a young age precisely because they are poor—because they do not have the opportunity to acquire an education, because meaningful, well-paying jobs and creative forms of recreation are not accessible to them ... because safe, effective forms of contraception are not available to them.
    Angela Davis (b. 1944)