Dominated Convergence Theorem - Discussion of The Assumptions

Discussion of The Assumptions

The assumption that the sequence is dominated by some integrable g can not be dispensed with. This may be seen as follows: define ƒ_n(x) = n for x in the interval (0, 1/n] and ƒ_n(x) = 0 otherwise. Any g which dominates the sequence must also dominate the pointwise supremum h = sup_n ƒ_n. Observe that

$\int_0^1 h(x)\,dx \ge \int_{1/m}^1{h(x)\,dx} = \sum_{n=1}^{m-1} \int_{\left(\frac1{n+1},\frac1n\right]}{n\,dx} = \sum_{n=1}^{m-1} \frac{1}{n+1} \to \infty \quad \text{as }m\to\infty$

by the divergence of the harmonic series. Hence, the monotonicity of the Lebesgue integral tells us that there exists no integrable function which dominates the sequence on . A direct calculation shows that integration and pointwise limit do not commute for this sequence:

$\int_0^1 \lim_{n\to\infty} f_n(x)\,dx = 0 \neq 1 = \lim_{n\to\infty}\int_0^1 f_n(x)\,dx,$

because the pointwise limit of the sequence is the zero function. Note that the sequence {ƒ_n} is not even uniformly integrable, hence also the Vitali convergence theorem is not applicable.

Read more about this topic: Dominated Convergence Theorem

Famous quotes containing the words discussion of, discussion and/or assumptions:

“Americans, unhappily, have the most remarkable ability to alchemize all bitter truths into an innocuous but piquant confection and to transform their moral contradictions, or public discussion of such contradictions, into a proud decoration, such as are given for heroism on the battle field.”
—James Baldwin (1924–1987)

“There are answers which, in turning away wrath, only send it to the other end of the room, and to have a discussion coolly waived when you feel that justice is all on your own side is even more exasperating in marriage than in philosophy.”
—George Eliot [Mary Ann (or Marian)

“Why did he think adding meant increase?
To me it was dilution. Where do these
Innate assumptions come from?”
—Philip Larkin (1922–1986)