Dominated Convergence Theorem - Discussion of The Assumptions

Discussion of The Assumptions

The assumption that the sequence is dominated by some integrable g can not be dispensed with. This may be seen as follows: define ƒ_n(x) = n for x in the interval (0, 1/n] and ƒ_n(x) = 0 otherwise. Any g which dominates the sequence must also dominate the pointwise supremum h = sup_n ƒ_n. Observe that

$\int_0^1 h(x)\,dx \ge \int_{1/m}^1{h(x)\,dx} = \sum_{n=1}^{m-1} \int_{\left(\frac1{n+1},\frac1n\right]}{n\,dx} = \sum_{n=1}^{m-1} \frac{1}{n+1} \to \infty \quad \text{as }m\to\infty$

by the divergence of the harmonic series. Hence, the monotonicity of the Lebesgue integral tells us that there exists no integrable function which dominates the sequence on . A direct calculation shows that integration and pointwise limit do not commute for this sequence:

$\int_0^1 \lim_{n\to\infty} f_n(x)\,dx = 0 \neq 1 = \lim_{n\to\infty}\int_0^1 f_n(x)\,dx,$

because the pointwise limit of the sequence is the zero function. Note that the sequence {ƒ_n} is not even uniformly integrable, hence also the Vitali convergence theorem is not applicable.

Read more about this topic: Dominated Convergence Theorem

Famous quotes containing the words discussion of, discussion and/or assumptions:

“Americans, unhappily, have the most remarkable ability to alchemize all bitter truths into an innocuous but piquant confection and to transform their moral contradictions, or public discussion of such contradictions, into a proud decoration, such as are given for heroism on the battle field.”
—James Baldwin (1924–1987)

“If we had had more time for discussion we should probably have made a great many more mistakes.”
—Leon Trotsky (1879–1940)

“Why did he think adding meant increase?
To me it was dilution. Where do these
Innate assumptions come from?”
—Philip Larkin (1922–1986)