Definition
The sequence of N complex numbers x0, ..., xN−1 is transformed into another sequence of N complex numbers according to the DFT formula:
-
(Eq.1)
The transform is sometimes denoted by the symbol, as in or or .
Eq.1 can be interpreted or derived in various ways, for example:
- It completely describes the discrete-time Fourier transform (DTFT) of an N-periodic sequence, which comprises only discrete frequency components. (Discrete-time Fourier transform#Periodic data)
- It can also provide uniformly spaced samples of the continuous DTFT of a finite length sequence. (Sampling the DTFT)
- It is the discrete analogy of the formula for the coefficients of a Fourier series:
-
(Eq.2)
which is the inverse DFT (IDFT). Each is a complex number that encodes both amplitude and phase of a sinusoidal component of function .
The sinusoid's frequency is cycles per sample. Its amplitude and phase are:
where atan2 is the two-argument form of the arctan function. The normalization factor multiplying the DFT and IDFT (here 1 and 1/N) and the signs of the exponents are merely conventions, and differ in some treatments. The only requirements of these conventions are that the DFT and IDFT have opposite-sign exponents and that the product of their normalization factors be 1/N. A normalization of for both the DFT and IDFT makes the transforms unitary, which has some theoretical advantages. But it is often more practical in numerical computation to perform the scaling all at once as above (and a unit scaling can be convenient in other ways).
(The convention of a negative sign in the exponent is often convenient because it means that is the amplitude of a "positive frequency", . Equivalently, the DFT is often thought of as a matched filter: when looking for a frequency of +1, one correlates the incoming signal with a frequency of −1.)
In the following discussion the terms "sequence" and "vector" will be considered interchangeable.
Read more about this topic: Discrete Fourier Transform
Famous quotes containing the word definition:
“Im beginning to think that the proper definition of Man is an animal that writes letters.”
—Lewis Carroll [Charles Lutwidge Dodgson] (18321898)
“The physicians say, they are not materialists; but they are:MSpirit is matter reduced to an extreme thinness: O so thin!But the definition of spiritual should be, that which is its own evidence. What notions do they attach to love! what to religion! One would not willingly pronounce these words in their hearing, and give them the occasion to profane them.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (18031882)
“The very definition of the real becomes: that of which it is possible to give an equivalent reproduction.... The real is not only what can be reproduced, but that which is always already reproduced. The hyperreal.”
—Jean Baudrillard (b. 1929)