Proof
Let f: N→N be the function defined by:
- f(#(θ)) = #(θ(#(θ))
for each T-formula θ in one free variable, and f(n) = 0 otherwise. The function f is computable, so there is a formula δ representing f in T. Thus for each formula θ, T proves
- (∀y) ,
which is to say
- (∀y) .
Now define the formula β(z) as:
- β(z) = (∀y) ,
then
- β(#(θ)) ⇔ (∀y) ,
which is to say
- β(#(θ)) ⇔ ψ(#(θ(#(θ))))
Let φ be the sentence β(#(β)). Then we can prove in T that:
- (*) φ ⇔ (∀y) ⇔ (∀y) .
Working in T, analyze two cases:
1. Assuming φ holds, substitute #(β(#(β)) for y in the rightmost formula in (*), and obtain:
- (#(β(#(β)) = #(β(#(β))) → ψ(#(β(#(β))),
Since φ = β(#(β)), it follows that ψ(#(φ)) holds.
2. Conversely, assume that ψ(#(β(#(β)))) holds. Then the final formula in (*) must be true, and φ is also true.
Thus φ ↔ ψ(#(φ)) is provable in T, as desired.
Read more about this topic: Diagonal Lemma
Famous quotes containing the word proof:
“There is no better proof of a man’s being truly good than his desiring to be constantly under the observation of good men.”
—François, Duc De La Rochefoucauld (1613–1680)
“The thing with Catholicism, the same as all religions, is that it teaches what should be, which seems rather incorrect. This is “what should be.” Now, if you’re taught to live up to a “what should be” that never existed—only an occult superstition, no proof of this “should be”Mthen you can sit on a jury and indict easily, you can cast the first stone, you can burn Adolf Eichmann, like that!”
—Lenny Bruce (1925–1966)
“The insatiable thirst for everything which lies beyond, and which life reveals, is the most living proof of our immortality.”
—Charles Baudelaire (1821–1867)