Discussion Topics When Setting Up An Experimental Design
When you want to set up an experimental design or randomized clinical trial there are a couple of things that need to be thought of before actually doing the experiment . An experimental design is the laying out of a detailed experimental plan in advance of doing the experiment. Some of the following topics have already been discussed in the principals of experimental design section.
1. How many factors will the design have? and are the levels of these factors fixed or random?
2. Are control conditions needed, and what should they be?
3. Manipulation checks; did the manipulation really work?
4. Background variables.
5. Sample size. How many units need to be collected for the experiment to be generalisable and have enough power?
6. The relevance of interactions between factors.
7. The occurrence of delayed effects of substantive factors on outcomes.
8. The occurrence of response shifts in self-report measures.
9. The feasibility of repeated administration of the same measurement instruments to the same units at different occasions, with a post-test and follow-up tests.
10. The use of a proxy pretest.
11. Blocking variables.
12. Blinding. Should the client/patient, researcher or even the analyst of the data be blind to conditions?
13. The feasibility of subsequent application of different conditions to the same units.
Read more about this topic: Design Of Experiments
Famous quotes containing the words discussion, setting, experimental and/or design:
“Opinions are formed in a process of open discussion and public debate, and where no opportunity for the forming of opinions exists, there may be moods—moods of the masses and moods of individuals, the latter no less fickle and unreliable than the former—but no opinion.”
—Hannah Arendt (1906–1975)
“A fit abode for a poet. Stage setting at least correct.”
—Ezra Pound (1885–1972)
“When we run over libraries persuaded of these principles, what havoc must we make? If we take in our hand any volume; of divinity or school metaphysics, for instance; let us ask, Does it contain any abstract reasoning concerning quantity or number? No. Does it contain any experimental reasoning concerning matter of fact and existence? No. Commit it then to the flames; for it can contain nothing but sophistry and illusion.”
—David Hume (1711–1776)
“For I choose that my remembrances of him should be pleasing, affecting, religious. I will love him as a glorified friend, after the free way of friendship, and not pay him a stiff sign of respect, as men do to those whom they fear. A passage read from his discourses, a moving provocation to works like his, any act or meeting which tends to awaken a pure thought, a flow of love, an original design of virtue, I call a worthy, a true commemoration.”
—Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)