Evolution of Cuba's Population
| Census history | ||
|---|---|---|
| Year | Population | |
| 1774 | 171,600 | |
| 1792 | 274,300 | |
| 1817 | 572,363 | |
| 1827 | 704,586 | |
| 1833 | 730,000 | |
| 1841 | 1,007,624 | |
| 1861 | 1,396,530 | |
| 1862 | 1,259,200 | |
| 1877 | 1,509,291 | |
| 1887 | 1,631,687 | |
| 1899 | 1,572,797 | |
| 1910 | 2,219,000 | |
| 1920 | 2,997,000 | |
| 1930 | 3,647,000 | |
| 1950 | 5,516,000 | |
| 1980 | 9,724,000 | |
| 2000 | 11,142,000 | |
| 2010 | 11,241,161 | |
| Official 1775-1899 Cuba Census | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White | Non-white | |||||||
| Census | Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | ||||
| 1775 | 96,440 | 56.2 | 75,180 | 43.8 | ||||
| 1792 | 153,559 | 56.4 | 118,741 | 43.6 | ||||
| 1817 | 257,380 | 45.0 | 314,983 | 55.0 | ||||
| 1827 | 311,051 | 44.2 | 393,435 | 55.8 | ||||
| 1841 | 418,291 | 41.5 | 589,333 | 58.5 | ||||
| 1861 | 793,484 | 56.8 | 603,046 | 43.2 | ||||
| 1877 | 1,023,394 | 67.8 | 485,897 | 32.2 | ||||
| 1887 | 1,102,889 | 67.6 | 528,798 | 32.4 | ||||
| 1899 | 1,067,354 | 67.9 | 505,443 | 32.1 | ||||
Read more about this topic: Demographics Of Cuba
Famous quotes containing the words evolution of, evolution, cuba and/or population:
“The evolution of sense is, in a sense, the evolution of nonsense.”
—Vladimir Nabokov (1899–1977)
“As a natural process, of the same character as the development of a tree from its seed, or of a fowl from its egg, evolution excludes creation and all other kinds of supernatural intervention.”
—Thomas Henry Huxley (1825–95)
“Bernstein: “Girls delightful in Cuba stop. Could send you prose poems about scenery but don’t feel right spending your money stop. There is no war in Cuba. Signed Wheeler.” Any answer?
Charles Foster Kane: Yes—Dear Wheeler, You provide the prose poems, I’ll provide the war.”
—Orson Welles (1915–1985)
“What happened at Hiroshima was not only that a scientific breakthrough ... had occurred and that a great part of the population of a city had been burned to death, but that the problem of the relation of the triumphs of modern science to the human purposes of man had been explicitly defined.”
—Archibald MacLeish (1892–1982)