Virtual Rules of Inference
From the examples, you can see that we have added three virtual (or extra and temporary) rules of inference to our normal axiomatic logic. These are "hypothesis", "reiteration", and "deduction". The normal rules of inference (i.e. "modus ponens" and the various axioms) remain available.
1. Hypothesis is a step where one adds an additional premise to those already available. So, if your previous step S was deduced as:
then one adds another premise H and gets:
This is symbolized by moving from the n-th level of indentation to the n+1-th level and saying
-
-
-
-
- S previous step
- H hypothesis
- S previous step
-
-
-
2. Reiteration is a step where one re-uses a previous step. In practice, this is only necessary when one wants to take a hypothesis which is not the most recent hypothesis and use it as the final step before a deduction step.
3. Deduction is a step where one removes the most recent hypothesis (still available) and prefixes it to the previous step. This is shown by unindenting one level as follows:
-
-
-
-
-
- H hypothesis
- ......... (other steps)
- C (conclusion drawn from H)
- H→C deduction
-
-
-
-
Read more about this topic: Deduction Theorem
Famous quotes containing the words virtual, rules and/or inference:
“Tragedy dramatizes human life as potentiality and fulfillment. Its virtual future, or Destiny, is therefore quite different from that created in comedy. Comic Destiny is Fortunewhat the world will bring, and the man will take or miss, encounter or escape; tragic Destiny is what the man brings, and the world will demand of him. That is his Fate.”
—Susanne K. Langer (18951985)
“Different rules apply when it gets this late. You know what I mean? Its, like, after hours.”
—Joseph Minion, U.S. screenwriter, and Martin Scorsese. Peter (Rocco Sisto)
“Rules and particular inferences alike are justified by being brought into agreement with each other. A rule is amended if it yields an inference we are unwilling to accept; an inference is rejected if it violates a rule we are unwilling to amend. The process of justification is the delicate one of making mutual adjustments between rules and accepted inferences; and in the agreement achieved lies the only justification needed for either.”
—Nelson Goodman (b. 1906)