De Moivre's Formula - Formulas For Cosine and Sine Individually

Formulas For Cosine and Sine Individually

See also: List of trigonometric identities

Being an equality of complex numbers, one necessarily has equality both of the real parts and of the imaginary parts of both members of the equation. If x, and therefore also cos x and sin x, are real numbers, then the identity of these parts can be written using binomial coefficients. This formula was given by 16th century French mathematician Franciscus Vieta:

In each of these two equations, the final trigonometric function equals one or minus one or zero, thus removing half the entries in each of the sums. These equations are in fact even valid for complex values of x, because both sides are entire (that is, holomorphic on the whole complex plane) functions of x, and two such functions that coincide on the real axis necessarily coincide everywhere. Here are the concrete instances of these equations for n = 2 and n = 3:

\begin{alignat}2 \cos(2x) &= (\cos{x})^2 +((\cos{x})^2-1) &&= 2(\cos{x})^2-1\\ \sin(2x) &= 2(\sin{x})(\cos{x})\\ \cos(3x) &= (\cos{x})^3 +3\cos{x}((\cos{x})^2-1) &&= 4(\cos{x})^3-3\cos{x}\\ \sin(3x) &= 3(\cos{x})^2(\sin{x})-(\sin{x})^3 &&= 3\sin{x}-4(\sin{x})^3.\\ \end{alignat}

The right hand side of the formula for cos(nx) is in fact the value Tn(cos x) of the Chebyshev polynomial Tn at cos x.

Read more about this topic:  De Moivre's Formula

Famous quotes containing the words formulas, sine and/or individually:

    “That’s the great danger of sectarian opinions, they always accept the formulas of past events as useful for the measurement of future events and they never are, if you have high standards of accuracy.”
    —John Dos Passos (1896–1970)

    “Hamm as stated, and Clov as stated, together as stated, nec tecum nec sine te, in such a place, and in such a world, that’s all I can manage, more than I could.”
    —Samuel Beckett (1906–1989)

    “One of your biggest jobs as a parent of multiples is no bigger than simply talking to your children individually and requiring that they respond to you individually as well. The benefits of this kind of communication can be enormous, in terms of the relationship you develop with each child, in terms of their language development, and eventually in terms of their sense of individuality, too.”
    —Pamela Patrick Novotny (20th century)