Darlene Hooley - Electoral History

Electoral History

Oregon's 5th congressional district: Results 1996–2006
Year Democrat Votes Pct Republican Votes Pct 3rd Party Party Votes Pct 3rd Party Party Votes Pct
1996 Darlene Hooley 139,521 51% Jim Bunn 125,409 46% Lawrence Knight Duquesne Libertarian 5,191 2% Trey Smith Socialist 2,124 1% *
1998 Darlene Hooley 124,916 55% Marylin Shannon 92,215 41% Michael Donnelly Pacific Green 3,637 2% Blaine Thallheimer Libertarian 2,979 1% *
2000 Darlene Hooley 156,315 57% Brian J. Boquist 118,631 43% *
2002 Darlene Hooley 137,713 55% Brian J. Boquist 113,441 45% *
2004 Darlene Hooley 184,833 53% Jim Zupancic 154,993 44% Jerry Defoe Libertarian 6,463 2% Joseph H. Bitz Constitution 2,971 1% *
2006 Darlene Hooley 146,973 54% Mike Erickson 116,424 43% Paul Aranas Pacific Green 4,194 2% Douglas Patterson Constitution 4,160 2% *
* In 1996, minor candidates received 391 votes. In 1998, Natural Law candidate Jim Burns received 2,284 votes (1%); Socialist candidate Ed Dover received 1,378 votes; and minor candidates received 248 votes. In 2000, write-ins received 402 votes. In 2002, minor candidates received 383 votes. In 2004, minor candidates received 374 votes. In 2006, write-ins received 483 votes.

Read more about this topic:  Darlene Hooley

Famous quotes containing the words electoral and/or history:

    Nothing is more unreliable than the populace, nothing more obscure than human intentions, nothing more deceptive than the whole electoral system.
    Marcus Tullius Cicero (106–43 B.C.)

    To summarize the contentions of this paper then. Firstly, the phrase ‘the meaning of a word’ is a spurious phrase. Secondly and consequently, a re-examination is needed of phrases like the two which I discuss, ‘being a part of the meaning of’ and ‘having the same meaning.’ On these matters, dogmatists require prodding: although history indeed suggests that it may sometimes be better to let sleeping dogmatists lie.
    —J.L. (John Langshaw)