Convolution Theorem - Proof

Proof

The proof here is shown for a particular normalisation of the Fourier transform. As mentioned above, if the transform is normalised differently, then constant scaling factors will appear in the derivation.

Let f, g belong to L1(Rn). Let be the Fourier transform of and be the Fourier transform of :

where the dot between x and ν indicates the inner product of Rn. Let be the convolution of and

Now notice that

Hence by Fubini's theorem we have that so its Fourier transform is defined by the integral formula

\begin{align} H(\nu) = \mathcal{F}\{h\} &= \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} h(z) e^{-2 \pi i z\cdot\nu}\, dz \\ &= \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} f(x) g(z-x)\, dx\, e^{-2 \pi i z\cdot \nu}\, dz. \end{align}

Observe that and hence by the argument above we may apply Fubini's theorem again (i.e. interchange the order of integration):

Substitute ; then, so:

These two integrals are the definitions of and, so:

QED.

Read more about this topic:  Convolution Theorem

Famous quotes containing the word proof:

    “Talk shows are proof that conversation is dead.”
    —Mason Cooley (b. 1927)

    “a meek humble Man of modest sense,
    Who preaching peace does practice continence;
    Whose pious life’s a proof he does believe,
    Mysterious truths, which no Man can conceive.”
    —John Wilmot, 2d Earl Of Rochester (1647–1680)

    “If we view our children as stupid, naughty, disturbed, or guilty of their misdeeds, they will learn to behold themselves as foolish, faulty, or shameful specimens of humanity. They will regard us as judges from whom they wish to hide, and they will interpret everything we say as further proof of their unworthiness. If we view them as innocent, or at least merely ignorant, they will gain understanding from their experiences, and they will continue to regard us as wise partners.”
    —Polly Berrien Berends (20th century)