Convolution Theorem - Proof

Proof

The proof here is shown for a particular normalisation of the Fourier transform. As mentioned above, if the transform is normalised differently, then constant scaling factors will appear in the derivation.

Let f, g belong to L1(Rn). Let be the Fourier transform of and be the Fourier transform of :

where the dot between x and ν indicates the inner product of Rn. Let be the convolution of and

Now notice that

Hence by Fubini's theorem we have that so its Fourier transform is defined by the integral formula

\begin{align} H(\nu) = \mathcal{F}\{h\} &= \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} h(z) e^{-2 \pi i z\cdot\nu}\, dz \\ &= \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} f(x) g(z-x)\, dx\, e^{-2 \pi i z\cdot \nu}\, dz. \end{align}

Observe that and hence by the argument above we may apply Fubini's theorem again (i.e. interchange the order of integration):

Substitute ; then, so:

These two integrals are the definitions of and, so:

QED.

Read more about this topic:  Convolution Theorem

Famous quotes containing the word proof:

    “There is no better proof of a man’s being truly good than his desiring to be constantly under the observation of good men.”
    —François, Duc De La Rochefoucauld (1613–1680)

    “The thing with Catholicism, the same as all religions, is that it teaches what should be, which seems rather incorrect. This is “what should be.” Now, if you’re taught to live up to a “what should be” that never existed—only an occult superstition, no proof of this “should be”Mthen you can sit on a jury and indict easily, you can cast the first stone, you can burn Adolf Eichmann, like that!”
    —Lenny Bruce (1925–1966)

    “It comes to pass oft that a terrible oath, with a swaggering accent sharply twanged off, gives manhood more approbation than ever proof itself would have earned him.”
    —William Shakespeare (1564–1616)