Uses of Content Analysis
Ole Holsti (1969) groups 15 uses of content analysis into three basic categories:
- make inferences about the antecedents of a communication
- describe and make inferences about characteristics of a communication
- make inferences about the effects of a communication.
He also places these uses into the context of the basic communication paradigm.
The following table shows fifteen uses of content analysis in terms of their general purpose, element of the communication paradigm to which they apply, and the general question they are intended to answer.
| Uses of Content Analysis by Purpose, Communication Element, and Question | ||||
| Purpose | Element | Question | Use | |
| Make inferences about the antecedents of communications | Source | Who? |
|
|
| Encoding process | Why? |
|
||
| Describe & make inferences about the characteristics of communications | Channel | How? |
|
|
| Message | What? |
|
||
| Recipient | To whom? |
|
||
| Make inferences about the consequences of communications | Decoding process | With what effect? |
|
|
| Note. Purpose, communication element, & question from Holsti (1969). Uses primarily from Berelson (1952) as adapted by Holsti (1969). | ||||
Read more about this topic: Content Analysis
Famous quotes containing the words content and/or analysis:
“Strange that so few ever come to the woods to see how the pine lives and grows and spires, lifting its evergreen arms to the light,—to see its perfect success; but most are content to behold it in the shape of many broad boards brought to market, and deem that its true success! But the pine is no more lumber than man is, and to be made into boards and houses is no more its true and highest use than the truest use of a man is to be cut down and made into manure.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)
“Whatever else American thinkers do, they psychologize, often brilliantly. The trouble is that psychology only takes us so far. The new interest in families has its merits, but it will have done us all a disservice if it turns us away from public issues to private matters. A vision of things that has no room for the inner life is bankrupt, but a psychology without social analysis or politics is both powerless and very lonely.”
—Joseph Featherstone (20th century)